CISO Tribune

Company record · security vendor

CyberKord

CISO Tribune company record: CyberKord, security vendor (AI SOC analysts)

Where CyberKord appears on the record (118)

Every page on CISO Tribune and its network that carries this company, 118 in all.

Compared with (113)

vs 7AI, vs Abnormal AI, vs Acalvio, vs Anchore, vs Anomali, vs Astra Security, vs Attaxion, vs AuthMind, vs Axonius, vs Beacon, vs Beyond Identity, vs Binary Defense, vs Bitsight, vs Blackpoint Cyber, vs Blue Mantis, vs Brinqa, vs Cayosoft, vs Cognition, vs Conifers, vs ConnectSecure, vs CrowdStrike, vs CyberProof, vs Cygrid, vs Cyrenity, vs Cyware, vs D3 Security, vs DeepSeas, vs Defendify, vs Delinea, vs Devo, vs Dropzone AI, vs Dynatrace, vs Eclypsium, vs Elastic, vs Elbit Systems, vs Exabeam, vs Exaforce, vs FireMon, vs Flashpoint, vs Graylog, vs Guardare, vs Guardsix, vs Guardz, vs Gurucul, vs HackenProof, vs HackerOne, vs Halo Security, vs HCLSoftware, vs Helix, vs Hive Pro, vs Hunters, vs Huntress, vs HYPR, vs ICF, vs Indurex, vs Infosys, vs Intezer, vs Intruder, vs IRONSCALES, vs JupiterOne, vs Kai, vs Lansweeper, vs Legion Security, vs Leidos, vs Malwarebytes, vs Mate Security, vs Material Security, vs Mave, vs Miggo, vs Mitiga, vs NopSec, vs Nucleus Security, vs Oasis Security, vs Obsidian Security, vs P0 Security, vs Panther, vs Parsons, vs Pentio, vs Permiso, vs Proficio, vs Prophet Security, vs Qualys, vs RAD Security, vs Rapid7, vs RapidFort, vs Reach Security, vs Red Hat, vs Red Sentry, vs ReliaQuest, vs Rival Security, vs RunReveal, vs Securonix, vs Semperis, vs SentinelOne, vs ServiceNow, vs Silverfort, vs Splunk, vs Stellar Cyber, vs Sublime Security, vs Swimlane, vs Tenable, vs Third Wave Innovations, vs ThreatDefence, vs Tines, vs Torq, vs Transmit Security, vs UnderDefense, vs Valence, vs Vectra AI, vs VulnCheck, vs WatchGuard Technologies, vs YesWeHack, vs Zafran Security

What the company sells

CyberKord sells a service that answers security alerts day and night, without waiting for a person. CyberKord starts from what a SOC already produces: an alert, a ticket, or a message in Teams or Slack.

EDR, XDR, SIEM and exposure tools already raise the alert. After that, an analyst triages, scopes the blast radius and agrees the change, and until someone acts the attacker keeps moving. CyberKord works between the alert and the action.

CyberKord uses a live map that shows which assets are affected and reachable. Only what is exploitable in the customer's environment is kept. The change runs on a copy first, to show what changes and what breaks. A rule set by the customer decides whether CyberKord acts now or asks first.

Each use case starts from an alert, a ticket or a message that the team already receives. CyberKord checks exposure, simulates the containment and applies it, and the report is waiting in the morning.

CyberKord can run with no write access, so the team sees what it would have done on real alerts. With approval, CyberKord proves the change on the simulation, the team signs off and CyberKord applies it. After enough safe outcomes on record, CyberKord can act on its own, with no human bottleneck unless the customer wants one.

One container reads the customer's tools and alerts. CyberKord produces reports on real alerts from the SOC, with no production changes. The customer decides which alerts CyberKord acts on, and when. CyberKord is backed by 360 Capital, Plus Partners, Addendum Capital and Vento (Exor).[1][2]

Headquarters
Not established from our sources
Founded
Not established from our sources
Ownership
Not established from our sources
CISO on record
Not yet on our record. Send a verified source

Products and services

Product names as the company writes them; what each does, in our words, from the company's own product pages. Never how well it does it.

  • CyberKord[1][2]

    A platform that reads alerts from EDR/XDR, SIEM, scans and tickets, re-scores them against a live asset map, simulates a containment change on a copy of the environment, and then applies and logs the action based on rules the customer sets.

Competitors and alternatives

The other companies on our record filed under the same categories, category by category: first those that lead with that category and share more of CyberKord's categories, then alphabetical. A list from the record, never a ranking.

References

Every fact above cites one of these by number. Tier A is the company itself, a regulator or a filing; tier B is trade or business press.

  1. [1]cyberkord.comCyberKord · cyberkord.com · undated page, accessed November 6, 2026 · Tier A: the company, a regulator or a filing
  2. [2]CyberKordCyberKord · undated page, accessed November 11, 2026 · Tier A: the company, a regulator or a filing

Last verified November 6, 2026. Our code found the quoted passage behind each fact on its source page when the fact was recorded, and re-checks every record against its sources each month.

Recorded November 6, 2026, expanded November 11, 2026 from the references above.

Work for CyberKord? Suggest a correction to a fact on this page (with a source on your own domain), or claim this entry by publishing a small file on your domain.

Security leadership

CISO Tribune has not yet recorded who holds the top security seat at CyberKord. We add a seat only from a verified source; if you have one, send it to the desk.

Questions CISOs ask about CyberKord

What does CyberKord sell?
CyberKord sells CyberKord. CyberKord: A platform that reads alerts from EDR/XDR, SIEM, scans and tickets, re-scores them against a live asset map, simulates a containment change on a copy of the environment, and then applies and logs the action based on rules the customer sets.
How does CISO Tribune file CyberKord?
CISO Tribune files CyberKord under AI SOC analysts, with SOAR and security automation, Vulnerability management and Identity threat detection and response as secondary categories.

Related guides