CISO Tribune

Vendor comparison · 2 companies

CyberKord vs Mave

CyberKord sells a service that answers security alerts day and night, without waiting for a person. Mave runs investigations, searches, threat hunts, detection hardening, and governed responses across a customer's existing stack. CISO Tribune files both under AI SOC analysts. This page sets the two records side by side: what each sells, where it is based, who owns and funds it, the customers it names and its recent news, each fact numbered to its source.

Change the companies

Up to four companies side by side.

  • CyberKord
  • Mave
CyberKord vs Mave: Products, Customers and Funding Compared
CyberKordCyberKord sells a service that answers security alerts day and night, without waiting for a person.cyberkord.comMaveMave runs investigations, searches, threat hunts, detection hardening, and governed responses across a customer's existing stack.mave.com
What it sells
  • CyberKord[1][2]A platform that reads alerts from EDR/XDR, SIEM, scans and tickets, re-scores them against a live asset map, simulates a containment change on a copy of the environment, and then applies and logs the action based on rules the customer sets.
  • AI SOC[1][14]Governed AI agents that investigate alerts, apply threat intelligence, hunt across tools, improve detections, and execute authorized response actions.
  • Threat Hunting[1][13]Runs continuous, cross-tool threat hunts for threats that never triggered an alert.
  • Detection Engineering[1][13]Finds coverage gaps, tunes noisy detection rules, and creates new detections.
  • Threat Intelligence[1][9][10][14]Converts relevant threat intelligence into investigations, threat hunts, detections, and authorized responses.
Categories
Headquarters
Not stated on its pagesNot stated on its pages
Founded
Not stated on its pagesNot stated on its pages
Ownership and funding
Not stated on its pagesNot stated on its pages
Named customers
Not stated on its pagesNot stated on its pages
Recent news
Not stated on its pagesNot stated on its pages
G2 and Gartner Peer Insights
  • G2: Not stated on its pages
  • Gartner Peer Insights: Not stated on its pages
  • G2: Not stated on its pages
  • Gartner Peer Insights: Not stated on its pages
Who it fits
Not written yetFrom its own pages, Mave sells mainly to security operations teams that run many tools and want investigation, hunting, detection work, and response across the stack they already have. Mave addresses managed security service providers that want to scale without adding analysts at the same rate as customers. Mave addresses organizations with multiple SIEMs, tenants, and subsidiaries. Mave addresses organizations that want to reduce SIEM ingestion and retention costs. Mave addresses organizations that want alert triage, investigation, and response in-house, and organizations with on-premises workloads alongside cloud and SaaS. Mave also describes an alternative package for smaller teams.
Last verified
November 6, 2026October 23, 2026

Where they overlap

  • AI SOC analysts is the primary category of both CyberKord and Mave.

Where they differ, field by field

  • CyberKord is also filed under SOAR and security automation, Vulnerability management and Identity threat detection and response. Mave is also filed under SIEM and Threat intelligence.
  • CyberKord lists CyberKord. Mave lists AI SOC, Threat Hunting, Detection Engineering and Threat Intelligence.

How they differ

CISO Tribune also files CyberKord under SOAR and security automation, Vulnerability management, and Identity threat detection and response. Mave sells governed AI agents that investigate alerts, apply threat intelligence, hunt across tools, improve detections, and execute authorized response actions. CISO Tribune files Mave under SIEM and Threat intelligence in addition to its primary category.

On the product side, Mave lists separate offerings for Threat Hunting, Detection Engineering, and Threat Intelligence. Mave works across detection languages including SPL, KQL, YARA-L, Sigma, EQL, Lucene, and SQL-based rules. Mave queries data in the systems that already hold it and requires no telemetry migration or fixed SOAR playbook. CyberKord instead centers on the step between an alert and an action, and it can run with no write access so a team sees what it would have done on real alerts. Both let the customer decide what acts automatically: CyberKord uses a customer-set rule to act now or ask first, and Mave lets the customer set what runs automatically and what waits for a human. Mave integrations start read-only.

Mave describes its buyers as security operations teams running many tools, managed security service providers, and organizations with multiple SIEMs, tenants, and subsidiaries. Mave is priced by endpoints protected and team size, not data volume, and it offers a fixed-price package for smaller teams. CyberKord is backed by 360 Capital, Plus Partners, Addendum Capital and Vento (Exor).

What it sells: Mave

What AI SOC does[1][14]
Mave runs an AI SOC across the security stack a customer already uses. Mave queries live data in the systems that already hold it, reasons across the evidence, and takes the next authorized action. No telemetry migration, duplicate data lake, central index, or fixed SOAR playbook is required.
What Threat Hunting does[1][13]
Mave applies threat intelligence to the customer's environment and runs continuous, cross-tool threat hunts across the SIEM, EDR, cloud, identity, and other security tools. Each finding becomes a complete investigation, a new or tuned detection, or an authorized response action. Source telemetry stays in place, with no new data lake, central index, or prebuilt correlation pipeline.
What Detection Engineering does[1][13]
Mave works across detection languages and formats, including SPL, KQL, YARA-L, Sigma, EQL, Lucene, and SQL-based rules. Agents review, create, translate, test, and tune detection content in the existing workflow, validate it against historical data where it already lives, and commit or deploy approved changes.
What Threat Intelligence does[1][9][10][14]
Mave determines which campaigns, actors, vulnerabilities, indicators, and techniques are relevant to the customer's environment. Mave evaluates each threat against assets, identities, technologies, vulnerabilities, detections, and live activity.

Questions about CyberKord and Mave

What do CyberKord and Mave sell?
CyberKord sells CyberKord. Mave sells AI SOC, Threat Hunting, Detection Engineering and Threat Intelligence.
Are CyberKord and Mave in the same category?
Yes. AI SOC analysts is the primary category of both on CISO Tribune.
Who are CyberKord and Mave sold to?
From its own pages, Mave sells mainly to security operations teams that run many tools and want investigation, hunting, detection work, and response across the stack they already have.

About CyberKord

CyberKord sells a service that answers security alerts day and night, without waiting for a person. CyberKord starts from what a SOC already produces: an alert, a ticket, or a message in Teams or Slack.[1][2]

EDR, XDR, SIEM and exposure tools already raise the alert. After that, an analyst triages, scopes the blast radius and agrees the change, and until someone acts the attacker keeps moving. CyberKord works between the alert and the action.[2]

CyberKord uses a live map that shows which assets are affected and reachable. Only what is exploitable in the customer's environment is kept. The change runs on a copy first, to show what changes and what breaks. A rule set by the customer decides whether CyberKord acts now or asks first.[2]

Each use case starts from an alert, a ticket or a message that the team already receives. CyberKord checks exposure, simulates the containment and applies it, and the report is waiting in the morning.[2]

CyberKord can run with no write access, so the team sees what it would have done on real alerts. With approval, CyberKord proves the change on the simulation, the team signs off and CyberKord applies it. After enough safe outcomes on record, CyberKord can act on its own, with no human bottleneck unless the customer wants one.[2]

One container reads the customer's tools and alerts. CyberKord produces reports on real alerts from the SOC, with no production changes. The customer decides which alerts CyberKord acts on, and when. CyberKord is backed by 360 Capital, Plus Partners, Addendum Capital and Vento (Exor).[2]

CyberKord on the record

Sources

CyberKord full record

  1. [1]cyberkord.comCyberKord · cyberkord.com · undated page, accessed November 6, 2026 · Tier A
  2. [2]CyberKordCyberKord · undated page, accessed November 11, 2026 · Tier A

Mave full record

  1. [1]mave.comMave · mave.com · undated page, accessed October 23, 2026 · Tier A
  2. [2]Terms and conditionsMave · mave.com · published February 15, 2026 · Tier A
  3. [3]AI Security Operations Platform | MaveMave · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  4. [4]Mave Platform | The SecOps Operating SystemMave · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  5. [5]Reduce MDR Reliance | MaveMave · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  6. [6]SIEM Cost Reduction & Replacement | MaveMave · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  7. [7]On-Prem SecOps Deployment | MaveMave · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  8. [8]Multi-SIEM & Post-M&A SecOps | MaveMave · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  9. [9]Multi-Tenant SecOps For MSSPs | MaveMave · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  10. [10]Threat Hunting | MaveMave · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  11. [11]Detection Engineering with MITRE ATT&CK | MaveMave · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  12. [12]Threat Intelligence | MaveMave · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  13. [13]Pricing | MaveMave · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  14. [14]AI SOC Agents for Full-Loop SecOps | MaveMave · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A

Spot a factual error? Request a correction.