CISO Tribune

Vendor comparison · 2 companies

Bay vs Grip Security

Bay is an AI agent security platform that gives enterprises visibility into every agent across devices, browsers and cloud workloads, and control over what those agents do in real time. Grip Security sells a SaaS Security Control Plane that helps organizations pinpoint, prioritize, and mitigate SaaS identity risks, including shadow SaaS, shadow AI, and rogue cloud accounts. CISO Tribune files both under Workforce AI usage security. This page sets the two records side by side: what each sells, where it is based, who owns and funds it, the customers it names and its recent news, each fact numbered to its source.

Change the companies

Up to four companies side by side.

  • Bay
  • Grip Security
Bay vs Grip Security: Products, Customers and Funding Compared
BayBay is an AI agent security platform that gives enterprises visibility into every agent across devices, browsers and cloud workloads, and control over what those agents do in real time.bay.ioGrip SecurityGrip Security sells a SaaS Security Control Plane that helps organizations pinpoint, prioritize, and mitigate SaaS identity risks, including shadow SaaS, shadow AI, and rogue cloud accounts.grip.security
What it sells
  • Bay[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]Bay is an AI agent security platform covering agents on devices, in browsers and in cloud workloads. Bay returns allow, ask, steer or block decisions on agent actions at runtime.
  • Lighthouse[6]Lighthouse is Bay's embedded agentic system that drafts policy from an organization's own agent activity.
  • Wave[3]Wave is the ephemeral binary Bay uses to deploy through an existing MDM or EDR.
  • Grip SaaS Security Control Plane (SSCP)Helps pinpoint, prioritize, and mitigate SaaS identity risks, including shadow SaaS, shadow AI, and rogue cloud accounts.
  • Grip Extend[8][14]A browser extension that addresses user managed identities across SaaS.
  • Grip SaaS Security Posture ManagementDelivers ongoing control over SaaS misconfigurations, security drift, and compliance gaps.
  • Grip ITDR 2.0Identity threat detection and response across SaaS.
Categories
Headquarters
Not stated on its pagesNot stated on its pages
Founded
Not stated on its pages2021[2]
Ownership and funding
Not stated on its pagesNot stated on its pages
Named customers
Not stated on its pagesNot stated on its pages
Recent news
Not stated on its pagesNot stated on its pages
G2 and Gartner Peer Insights
  • G2: Not stated on its pages
  • Gartner Peer Insights: Not stated on its pages
  • G2: listed, seen November 5, 2026[3]
  • Gartner Peer Insights: Not stated on its pages
Who it fits
Not written yetFrom its own pages, Grip sells to CISOs who raise visibility, risk, and access control as their concerns. Grip says its ITDR 2.0 product is aimed at SecOps teams. Grip's pages describe SaaS adoption by enterprises of all sizes and industries. Grip says its workflows suit existing control points such as CASB, endpoint protection, and IAM/SSO.
Last verified
November 5, 2026November 2, 2026

Where they overlap

  • Bay and Grip Security are both filed under Workforce AI usage security.

Where they differ, field by field

  • Bay's primary category is AI model and agent security; Grip Security's is SaaS security posture.
  • Bay is also filed under Endpoint management and application control. Grip Security is also filed under Non-human identity security.
  • Bay lists Bay, Lighthouse and Wave. Grip Security lists Grip SaaS Security Control Plane (SSCP), Grip Extend, Grip SaaS Security Posture Management and Grip ITDR 2.0.
  • Grip Security was founded in 2021.

What it sells: Bay

What Bay does[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]
Bay maps every agent, MCP server, extension, model and skill on devices on its first scan. Bay builds a contextual entity graph of the users, MCP servers, SaaS apps and access connected to each agent. Bay deploys with one script through an existing MDM and does not require a proxy. Bay keeps full transcripts of prompts, actions and MCP calls.
What Lighthouse does[6]
Lighthouse drafts policy from an organization's own agent activity. Users answer 7 questions about risk appetite, and Lighthouse recommends a setting for each question and builds the policy. Bay replays 30 days of agent history to show what a policy would do before enforcement.
What Wave does[3]
Bay is agentless and deploys through an existing MDM or EDR using Wave, an ephemeral binary. There is no persistent agent to maintain and no proxy in the path.

What it sells: Grip Security

What Grip SaaS Security Control Plane (SSCP) does
Grip SSCP uses identity as the key control point. It creates a unified risk profile based on user adoption, data used, user roles, privileges, and app data sensitivity. Grip SSCP automates mitigation and remediation processes.
What Grip Extend does[8][14]
Grip Extend identifies credential risks including reused, weak, or compromised passwords. It detects shared accounts and flags SaaS apps without MFA. It is integrated with Grip's SaaS Security Control Plane.
What Grip SaaS Security Posture Management does
Grip says it automates discovery and visibility so customers know what risks exist. Grip continuously maps SaaS-to-SaaS integrations, third- and fourth-party connections, and OAuth tokens.
What Grip ITDR 2.0 does
Grip ITDR 2.0 detects identity threats in real time across all SaaS. It detects malicious OAuth grants between apps and installation of malicious browser extensions. It enables one-click and automated threat responses.

Questions about Bay and Grip Security

What do Bay and Grip Security sell?
Bay sells Bay, Lighthouse and Wave. Grip Security sells Grip SaaS Security Control Plane (SSCP), Grip Extend, Grip SaaS Security Posture Management and Grip ITDR 2.0.
Are Bay and Grip Security in the same category?
They share Workforce AI usage security. Bay's primary category is AI model and agent security and Grip Security's is SaaS security posture.
When were Bay and Grip Security founded?
Grip Security was founded in 2021.
Who are Bay and Grip Security sold to?
From its own pages, Grip sells to CISOs who raise visibility, risk, and access control as their concerns.

About Bay

Bay is an AI agent security platform that gives enterprises visibility into every agent across devices, browsers and cloud workloads, and control over what those agents do in real time. Bay describes AI endpoint security as protection for the AI agents, coding assistants and MCP servers running on employee devices. Bay was founded by three engineers who spent their careers in endpoint and API security. Bay is a Series A stage company.[2][3]

Teams run agents like Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI and GitHub Copilot in clusters, cloud workspaces and hosted sessions.[5]

Bay finds and maps agents first. On the first scan, Bay maps every agent, MCP server, extension, model and skill on devices, including ones nobody approved. Bay finds every agent, extension, CLI tool, MCP server, skill and model on employee devices. Bay builds a contextual entity graph of how everything connects: the user behind each agent, the MCP servers and SaaS apps it touches, and the access it holds. Bay scans every agent, package, extension, MCP server and skill for malicious indicators before approval. In the browser, Bay brings shadow AI into view, covering chatbots, extensions and embedded SaaS agents. In cloud environments, Bay discovers agents across virtual machines, Kubernetes, Coder workspaces and hosted sessions.[1][3][5][6][7]

Lighthouse, Bay's embedded agentic system, drafts policy from an organization's own agent activity. Users answer 7 questions about risk appetite, and Lighthouse recommends a setting for each question and builds the policy. Policies can be scoped by IdP group, device or runtime, and can set which MCP servers can read or write. Before enforcement, Bay replays 30 days of agent history to show what a policy would do before any user is affected. Bay also lets teams run any policy in simulation mode to see what it would allow, ask or block. At runtime, Bay enforces guardrails inline with the agentic action and returns allow, ask, steer or block in milliseconds. Bay can also prevent prompt injection attempts at runtime.[6]

Bay keeps records of agent activity. Bay keeps full transcripts of prompts, actions and MCP calls, traceable to the person behind each session. A metadata-only mode in Bay keeps prompts on the device when they must not leave it. Bay ties every prompt and agent action to a real identity, corporate or personal. Bay logs every policy change and agent action with who approved it and whether a person or an agent took it. Every decision in Bay is logged against the policy behind it, ready for auditors. Bay connects to an identity provider, so every policy applies to the right people and groups.[5][6][7][8]

Bay also checks configuration. Bay checks how every agent and AI tool is set up, across devices and cloud workloads, so risky settings can be fixed before an agent puts them to use. Bay spots bypass-permissions mode, sandboxes switched off and unrestricted tool access, rates how serious each one is and shows how to fix it. Bay finds the credentials, tokens and secrets that agents and MCP servers can read.[9]

Bay deploys with one script through an existing MDM and does not require a proxy to route traffic through. Bay deploys through an existing MDM or EDR using Wave, an ephemeral binary, so there is no persistent agent to maintain. Bay tells corporate AI accounts from personal ones, including in personal Chrome profiles. Bay's enterprise customers include Micron Technology, Peloton and ClickUp.[1][2][3][6][7][8]

Bay on the record

Sources

Bay full record

  1. [1]bay.ioBay · bay.io · undated page, accessed November 5, 2026 · Tier A
  2. [2]Security Researcher — Careers at BayBay · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  3. [3]AI Endpoint Security — BayBay · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  4. [4]About — BayBay · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  5. [5]Cloud Workspaces — BayBay · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  6. [6]Platform — BayBay · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  7. [7]Browser — BayBay · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  8. [8]AI Governance & Compliance — BayBay · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  9. [9]AI Security Posture — BayBay · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A

Grip Security full record

  1. [1]grip.securityGrip Security · grip.security · undated page, accessed September 27, 2026 · Tier A
  2. [2]Grip security raising 41 million series b led by third point venturesGrip Security · grip.security · published August 22, 2023 · Tier A
  3. [3]Grip Security Reviews 2026: Details, Pricing, & Features - G2G2 · undated page, accessed October 25, 2026 · Tier C
  4. [4]SaaS Identity Security | Grip SaaS Security Control PlaneGrip Security · undated page, accessed November 5, 2026 · Tier A
  5. [5]Grip Security | The SaaS & AI Security Control PlaneGrip Security · undated page, accessed November 5, 2026 · Tier A
  6. [6]SaaS Security Control Plane (SSCP)Grip Security · undated page, accessed November 5, 2026 · Tier A
  7. [7]ITDR 2.0: Advanced Identity Threat Detection and ResponseGrip Security · undated page, accessed November 5, 2026 · Tier A
  8. [8]Gain Complete SaaS Visibility | Grip SecurityGrip Security · undated page, accessed November 5, 2026 · Tier A
  9. [9]Streamline SaaS Risk Prioritization | Grip SecurityGrip Security · undated page, accessed November 5, 2026 · Tier A
  10. [10]Efficient SaaS Risk Mitigation | Grip SecurityGrip Security · undated page, accessed November 5, 2026 · Tier A
  11. [11]SaaS Security Posture Management | Grip SecurityGrip Security · undated page, accessed November 5, 2026 · Tier A
  12. [12]AI SaaS Security & Governance Control Plane | Grip SecurityGrip Security · undated page, accessed November 5, 2026 · Tier A
  13. [13]Saas Security & Tech Integrations | Grip SecurityGrip Security · undated page, accessed November 5, 2026 · Tier A
  14. [14]Grip Extend User Security | Browser ExtensionGrip Security · undated page, accessed November 5, 2026 · Tier A

Spot a factual error? Request a correction.