CISO Tribune

Vendor comparison · 2 companies

Pillar Security vs Salt Security

Pillar Security sells one platform to discover, test, secure and govern every AI agent across an organization. Salt Security provides security for the APIs, MCP servers and data infrastructure where agents execute. CISO Tribune files both under AI model and agent security. This page sets the two records side by side: what each sells, where it is based, who owns and funds it, the customers it names and its recent news, each fact numbered to its source.

Change the companies

Up to four companies side by side.

  • Pillar Security
  • Salt Security
Pillar Security vs Salt Security: Products, Customers and Funding Compared
Pillar SecurityPillar Security sells one platform to discover, test, secure and govern every AI agent across an organization.pillar.securitySalt SecuritySalt Security provides security for the APIs, MCP servers and data infrastructure where agents execute.salt.security
What it sells
  • Agentic Endpoint[7][10]Protects the AI agents that run on employee machines.
  • Agentic Security Graph[4][8]Maps and correlates the full environment out-of-band.
  • Salt Surface[5][9]Provides agentless, outside-in discovery of MCP servers and APIs.
  • Salt Connect[5][9]Provides cloud and code inventory.
Categories
Headquarters
Not stated on its pagesPalo Alto, United States[1][3]
Founded
Not stated on its pages2016[1][11]
Ownership and funding
Owned by VantaNot stated on its pages
Named customers
Not stated on its pagesNot stated on its pages
Recent news
  • November 9, 2026Vanta signed a definitive agreement to acquire Pillar Security, an AI security platform that protects AI agents across their lifecycle.[11]
  • June 1, 2026Salt Security launched Salt Code, a component that enforces security policies on AI-generated code across the development lifecycle.[17]
G2 and Gartner Peer Insights
  • G2: Not stated on its pages
  • Gartner Peer Insights: Not stated on its pages
  • G2: listed, seen November 10, 2026[7]
  • Gartner Peer Insights: Not stated on its pages
Who it fits
Not written yetFrom its own pages, the company shows an industry solution for Finance, described as stop fraud and abuse. It lists one for Healthcare, described as HIPPAA-grade protection. Transportation is also listed, with secure logistics APIs. Retail is listed, with protect PII at scale. Software is listed, with API-first app security. Its whitepaper page also says security teams face a challenge in which the action layer goes unmonitored.
Last verified
November 10, 2026September 27, 2026

Where they overlap

  • Pillar Security and Salt Security are both filed under AI model and agent security.

Where they differ, field by field

  • Pillar Security's primary category is AI model and agent security; Salt Security's is API security.
  • Pillar Security is also filed under AI governance, AI firewalls and guardrails and Workforce AI usage security.
  • Pillar Security lists Agentic Endpoint. Salt Security lists Agentic Security Graph, Salt Surface and Salt Connect.
  • Salt Security is headquartered in Palo Alto, United States.
  • Salt Security was founded in 2016.
  • Pillar Security is owned by Vanta.

What it sells: Pillar Security

What Agentic Endpoint does[7][10]
Pillar deploys through an MDM and inventories the AI coding agents across a fleet: which agents run where, their versions, sandbox state and risk. Runtime Guardian sits in the agent's own pre-tool hook for Claude Code, Codex CLI and Cursor, and decides on every action before it runs. Pillar inventories local and remote servers across a fleet and scores each against a catalog of 23,000+ pre-analyzed servers.

What it sells: Salt Security

What Agentic Security Graph does[4][8]
Salt's Agentic Security Graph maps and correlates the full environment out-of-band. Salt describes its agentic security platform as one graph of agents, the MCP servers they use and the APIs they call, with the context behind each one.
What Salt Surface does[5][9]
Salt Surface provides agentless, outside-in discovery of MCP servers and APIs. Salt Surface discovers these from the outside, without an agent.
What Salt Connect does[5][9]
Salt Connect provides cloud and code inventory. Salt names Salt Connect together with collectors that are used where runtime analysis is needed.

Questions about Pillar Security and Salt Security

What do Pillar Security and Salt Security sell?
Pillar Security sells Agentic Endpoint. Salt Security sells Agentic Security Graph, Salt Surface and Salt Connect.
Are Pillar Security and Salt Security in the same category?
They share AI model and agent security. Pillar Security's primary category is AI model and agent security and Salt Security's is API security.
Where are Pillar Security and Salt Security headquartered?
Salt Security is headquartered in Palo Alto, United States.
When were Pillar Security and Salt Security founded?
Salt Security was founded in 2016.
Who owns Pillar Security and Salt Security?
Pillar Security is owned by Vanta.
Who are Pillar Security and Salt Security sold to?
From its own pages, the company shows an industry solution for Finance, described as stop fraud and abuse.
What have Pillar Security and Salt Security announced recently?
November 9, 2026: Vanta signed a definitive agreement to acquire Pillar Security, an AI security platform that protects AI agents across their lifecycle. June 1, 2026: Salt Security launched Salt Code, a component that enforces security policies on AI-generated code across the development lifecycle.

About Pillar Security

Pillar Security sells one platform to discover, test, secure and govern every AI agent across an organization. Pillar catalogs AI agents, models, prompts, frameworks, tools, MCP servers, skills and coding agents through agentless integrations. The catalog covers shadow AI and unapproved systems deployed without oversight. Pillar maps instructions, data sources, tool permissions, and external connections for each agent. Pillar traces dependencies across models and agent harness and scans agent configs, permissions, and identities.[1][2][3][4]

For discovery, Pillar works through agentless integrations with source code repos, data platforms, and endpoints. Pillar assesses risks in AI stacks from vulnerabilities in models, frameworks, and dependencies. Pillar flags violations when unsanctioned AI appears in an environment. Pillar policy rules enforce approved models, frameworks, and data sovereignty standards across an AI stack. Pillar generates audit reports for GDPR, SOC 2, EU AI Act, and ISO 42001.[4]

For testing, Pillar executes multi-turn adversarial attacks against complete AI systems to test tool orchestration, permission escalation, and agentic workflows. Pillar maps an AI attack surface as a graph showing relationships between agents, tools, permissions, and data sources. RedGraph maps how tools, prompts, and data combine to create exploitable surfaces specific to an environment. Pillar tests AI platforms, third-party agents, and production systems that a customer does not own or control through multi-step black box adversarial attacks against prompts, tools, and workflows. Pillar documents exploitability with attack transcripts, recordings and reproduction steps, and feeds validated findings into adaptive guardrails.[2][3][5]

For runtime protection, Pillar analyzes user and agent intent to detect malicious behavior before it impacts production. Pillar identifies PII, PHI, secrets, and credentials flowing through AI interactions in real time. Pillar applies configurable policies to mask, block, or log sensitive data before exposure to AI models or external systems. Pillar guardrails calibrate using red teaming findings from specific applications to tune protection against the manipulation patterns detected during testing. Pillar logs prompts, responses, tool invocations, and results with timestamps. Pillar streams telemetry to security platforms for centralized monitoring.[6]

For developer machines, Pillar deploys through an MDM and inventories the AI coding agents across a fleet: which agents run where, their versions, sandbox state and risk. Pillar runs full configuration scans for Claude Code, Cursor, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI, OpenCode and Pi Coding Agent, and detects other agents such as Amazon Q, Antigravity, Codeium and OpenClaw by fingerprint. Runtime Guardian sits in the agent's own pre-tool hook for Claude Code, Codex CLI and Cursor, and decides on every action before it runs. Pillar inventories local and remote servers across a fleet and scores each against a catalog of 23,000+ pre-analyzed servers. Pillar rolls out through Jamf Pro, Kandji, JumpCloud or any MDM that runs scripts, on macOS, Linux and Windows. On endpoints, Pillar analyzes permissions, credentials, access scopes, and auto-run settings, then provides step-by-step remediation. At runtime, Pillar monitors every prompt, tool call, and command to detect prompt injection, tool poisoning, and data exfiltration.[7][8]

For governance, Pillar translates governance policies into technical controls that enforce approved models, licensing standards, and data sovereignty requirements at every stage. Pillar extends governance controls to external AI providers, SaaS platforms, and vendor integrations. Pillar maps governance findings, testing results, and runtime logs to regulatory requirements automatically. Pillar adds a security enforcement layer on AI gateway frameworks without re-architecting a stack. Pillar inspects every prompt and response in real time for sensitive data exposure, prompt injection, toxic content, and policy violations. For tool integrations, Pillar validates at runtime that tool calls match their declared schemas and flags anomalous behavior, like a tool accessing resources outside its expected scope.[8][9]

Pillar can be deployed in its managed cloud, in a customer's own cloud account or data center, or as a mix of both. Self-hosted deployments include runtime guardrails, AI discovery, red teaming and agentic endpoint security. Adaptive guardrails are available in the managed cloud only today. Telemetry back to Pillar is off unless the customer enables it. A Fortune 300 manufacturer runs Pillar fully self-hosted. Pillar cites SOC 2 Type II and ISO/IEC 27001:2022.[1][6][7][8][10]

Pillar Security on the record

Sources

Pillar Security full record

  1. [1]pillar.securityPillar Security · pillar.security · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  2. [2]Pillar Security | Securing the Agentic WorkforcePillar Security · undated page, accessed November 11, 2026 · Tier A
  3. [3]Pillar Security Platform | Securing the Entire AI Software LifecyclePillar Security · undated page, accessed November 11, 2026 · Tier A
  4. [4]AI Discovery & Posture | Pillar SecurityPillar Security · undated page, accessed November 11, 2026 · Tier A
  5. [5]AI Red Teaming & Risk Detection | Pillar SecurityPillar Security · undated page, accessed November 11, 2026 · Tier A
  6. [6]AI Runtime Guardrails | Pillar SecurityPillar Security · undated page, accessed November 11, 2026 · Tier A
  7. [7]Agentic Endpoint: Secure AI Coding Agents | Pillar SecurityPillar Security · undated page, accessed November 11, 2026 · Tier A
  8. [8]AI Security Solutions | Pillar SecurityPillar Security · undated page, accessed November 11, 2026 · Tier A
  9. [9]AI Governance & Compliance | Pillar SecurityPillar Security · undated page, accessed November 11, 2026 · Tier A
  10. [10]Deployment Options: Cloud, Self-Hosted, Hybrid · PillarPillar Security · undated page, accessed November 11, 2026 · Tier A
  11. [11]Vanta to Acquire Pillar Security to Turn AI Policy Into PracticeBusiness Wire · published November 9, 2026 · Tier A

Salt Security full record

  1. [1]Salt security raises 140 million series d round led by capitalg at 1 4 billion valuationSalt Security · salt.security · undated page, accessed September 27, 2026 · Tier A
  2. [2]Salt security extends its agentic security platform with native ai detection and responseSalt Security · salt.security · published September 22, 2026 · Tier A
  3. [3]Contact usSalt Security · salt.security · undated page, accessed September 27, 2026 · Tier A
  4. [4]The Agentic Security Graph: A New Framework for the AI EraSalt Security · undated page, accessed October 28, 2026 · Tier A
  5. [5]Salt Security: Agentic AI Security, MCP Discovery, and API SecuritySalt Security · undated page, accessed October 28, 2026 · Tier A
  6. [6]EU AI Act Compliance 2026: What High-risk AI Systems Must Do Now | Salt SecuritySalt Security · undated page, accessed October 28, 2026 · Tier A
  7. [7]Salt Security Reviews & Product Details - G2G2 · undated page, accessed October 28, 2026 · Tier C
  8. [8]Onyx Security vs Salt Security | Secure the Agentic Action LayerSalt Security · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  9. [9]Securing APIs - API Attack Surface Management SolutionSalt Security · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  10. [10]Salt Security Master Services AgreementSalt Security · published May 20, 2026 · Tier A
  11. [11]API Security Company - About Us Salt Security API SecuritySalt Security · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  12. [12]Agentic Security Platform - Complete AI & API Protection PlatformSalt Security · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  13. [13]API Security Software - API Security Management SoftwareSalt Security · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  14. [14]Proactive API Security - “Shift Left" API DevelopmentSalt Security · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  15. [15]API Security Customers - Salt Security CustomersSalt Security · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  16. [16]API Security Trends - API Attacks, Breaches & Threats ReportSalt Security · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  17. [17]Salt Security launches Salt CodeSalt Security · published June 1, 2026 · Tier A

Spot a factual error? Request a correction.