CISO Tribune

Vendor comparison · 2 companies

Impart Security vs Miggo

Impart Security sells programmable, deterministic Layer 7 protection across AI, applications and APIs. Miggo is an Application Detection and Response (ADR) platform that shows which vulnerabilities are exploitable in running banking applications and shields them at runtime while the patch waits. CISO Tribune files both under AI model and agent security. This page sets the two records side by side: what each sells, where it is based, who owns and funds it, the customers it names and its recent news, each fact numbered to its source.

Change the companies

Up to four companies side by side.

  • Impart Security
  • Miggo
Impart Security vs Miggo: Products, Customers and Funding Compared
Impart SecurityImpart Security sells programmable, deterministic Layer 7 protection across AI, applications and APIs.impart.aiMiggoMiggo is an Application Detection and Response (ADR) platform that shows which vulnerabilities are exploitable in running banking applications and shields them at runtime while the patch waits.miggo.io
What it sells
  • Agent Protection[3][10]Enforces application-specific policies on agent traffic and tool interactions.
  • API Security[5][8][10]Enforces controls based on how APIs behave across requests and sessions.
  • Runtime Defense Harness[10]Uses AI-assisted investigation to develop targeted virtual patches.
  • Miggo Shield[2][5]Generates vulnerability-specific WAF rules tailored to applications.
  • Miggo WAF Copilot[7]Automates root cause analysis, payload testing, and rule creation for WAF rules.
Categories
Headquarters
San Francisco, United StatesNot stated on its pages
Founded
Not stated on its pagesNot stated on its pages
Ownership and funding
Privately heldNot stated on its pages
Named customers
Not stated on its pagesNot stated on its pages
Recent news
Not stated on its pagesNot stated on its pages
G2 and Gartner Peer Insights
  • G2: Not stated on its pages
  • Gartner Peer Insights: Not stated on its pages
  • G2: Not stated on its pages
  • Gartner Peer Insights: Not stated on its pages
Who it fits
Impart describes protection that runs inside an organisation's existing ingress. The stated coverage spans AI, applications and APIs. Impart also describes integrating its protection into existing ingress and egress infrastructure, with policies and runtime state synchronized across distributed environments.Miggo names legacy core banking platforms, third-party vendor software, and partner and payment integrations as systems that carry known CVEs that cannot be patched on a standard schedule. Miggo WAF Copilot is aimed at security teams that already run WAF tools. Miggo directs its runtime evidence at both security and development teams. Miggo describes agentless deployment with a single lightweight sensor.
Last verified
September 27, 2026October 23, 2026

Where they overlap

  • Impart Security and Miggo are both filed under AI model and agent security.

Where they differ, field by field

  • Impart Security's primary category is AI firewalls and guardrails; Miggo's is Cloud detection and response.
  • Impart Security is also filed under Bot and abuse management. Miggo is also filed under WAF and WAAP and Vulnerability management.
  • Impart Security lists Agent Protection, API Security and Runtime Defense Harness. Miggo lists Miggo Shield and Miggo WAF Copilot.
  • Impart Security is headquartered in San Francisco, United States.
  • Impart Security is privately held.

What it sells: Impart Security

What Agent Protection does[3][10]
Agent Protection enforces application-specific policies on agent traffic and tool interactions, using runtime context to restrict unauthorized actions and access. Agent Protection runs on the same ingress-layer enforcement engine that inspects the full attack surface.
What API Security does[5][8][10]
API Security enforces controls based on how APIs behave across requests and sessions, not just individual request signatures. Impart applies inline, sequence-aware enforcement to every API call. API Security detects and blocks shadow APIs as they are accessed. API Security prevents sensitive data (PII) from leaving the system.
What Runtime Defense Harness does[10]
Runtime Defense Harness uses AI-assisted investigation to develop targeted virtual patches and deploy protection through the same engine already protecting the applications. Targeted virtual patches are generated and tested against runtime traffic, with Policy as Code validated before deployment. AI-generated virtual patches are informed by runtime behavior, tested against live traffic and enforced through programmable Layer 7 controls.

What it sells: Miggo

What Miggo Shield does[2][5]
Miggo Shield generates vulnerability-specific WAF rules tailored to applications. Miggo generates a WAF rule scoped to the specific exploitable path, deploys it to AWS WAF or Cloudflare, and expires it automatically.
What Miggo WAF Copilot does[7]
Miggo WAF Copilot activates as soon as a new vulnerability is detected, or on demand, and analyzes public resources including code, exploits, and threat intel feeds. It generates payload variations, tests their exploitation, and builds a customized protection strategy that it validates with a simulation of potential attacks. It can be implemented across WAF platforms including Cloudflare, AWS, Azure, GCP, Akamai, F5, Fortinet, and Imperva.

Questions about Impart Security and Miggo

What do Impart Security and Miggo sell?
Impart Security sells Agent Protection, API Security and Runtime Defense Harness. Miggo sells Miggo Shield and Miggo WAF Copilot.
Are Impart Security and Miggo in the same category?
They share AI model and agent security. Impart Security's primary category is AI firewalls and guardrails and Miggo's is Cloud detection and response.
Where are Impart Security and Miggo headquartered?
Impart Security is headquartered in San Francisco, United States.
Who owns Impart Security and Miggo?
Impart Security is privately held.
Who are Impart Security and Miggo sold to?
Impart describes protection that runs inside an organisation's existing ingress. Miggo names legacy core banking platforms, third-party vendor software, and partner and payment integrations as systems that carry known CVEs that cannot be patched on a standard schedule.

About Impart Security

Impart Security sells programmable, deterministic Layer 7 protection across AI, applications and APIs. Impart enforces security policies directly in the application traffic path. Impart describes one programmable engine that unifies OWASP coverage, stateful behavioral analysis and custom security logic to block threats inline. Impart defines runtime enforcement as the ability to detect and block a threat at the moment the request is made, inline in the path of live traffic. Impart integrates programmable Layer 7 protection into existing ingress and egress infrastructure, enforces deterministic controls locally, and synchronizes policies and runtime state across distributed environments.[4][6][9][10]

For bots, Impart blocks credential stuffing, scraping and AI-driven automation with stateful controls that evaluate request patterns and session behavior. For agents, Impart enforces application-specific policies on agent traffic and tool interactions, using runtime context to restrict unauthorized actions and access. Impart detects and blocks shadow APIs as they are accessed. Impart's API enforcement prevents sensitive data (PII) from leaving the system.[8][10]

Impart sits between the agent and the customer's systems, enforcing security before any action executes. Agent protection runs on the same ingress-layer enforcement engine that inspects the full attack surface. Impart evaluates each prompt using session history, identity, prior model interactions and the chain of tool calls behind it. Impart's LLM enforcement sits inline between the caller and the model and runs before the prompt reaches inference. Impart builds a live catalog of every MCP server reaching the environment, sanctioned or not, and every tool exposed by each one. Policy-as-code in Impart applies the same way to AI clients, CLI users, web apps and direct API callers.[3][5][6][8]

Runtime Defense Harness uses AI-assisted investigation to develop targeted virtual patches and deploy protection through the same engine already protecting the applications. Impart generates and tests targeted virtual patches against runtime traffic, validating Policy as Code before deployment. Impart deploys custom virtual patches in under 60 minutes. Impart executes custom security logic inline using request context and shared session state, and blocks attacks without model inference in the traffic path.[4][10]

Impart runs inside the existing ingress, without adding an extra traffic hop or single point of failure. A lightweight module runs inside the existing ingress controller, capturing HTTP requests after TLS termination and passing them to a local inspector. If the inspector fails or times out, the module fails open. The Impart inspector runs locally alongside the ingress to evaluate request context, runtime state and custom security logic. Enforcement decisions in Impart are deterministic, and no AI inference or cloud round trip is required. Impart Cloud keeps policies and shared state in sync. Impart extends programmable Layer 7 protection to outbound AI requests and agent interactions through supported AI gateway infrastructure. Impart inspects traffic, applies custom security logic and protects sensitive data without replacing the existing gateway, routing or cost controls. The Impart Security plugin runs natively inside Kong Gateway, paired with an Impart Inspector running in the customer's own environment.[5][9][10]

Impart inspects every request to AI applications, web applications and APIs in the traffic path where it sits. The Impart integration with Wiz sends hosts to a Wiz tenant as Imported Assets, next to the cloud resources. Impart sends hostnames to Wiz and does not read Wiz issues, findings or resources. FanDuel replaced black-box security with Impart. Impart offered Crossbeam a single solution for web application, API security and LLM protection.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]

Impart Security on the record

Sources

Impart Security full record

  1. [1]impart.aiImpart Security · impart.ai · undated page, accessed September 27, 2026 · Tier A
  2. [2]impart.aiImpart Security · impart.ai · undated page, accessed September 27, 2026 · Tier A
  3. [3]Agent Protection - Control AI Agent Behavior | ImpartImpart Security · undated page, accessed September 27, 2026 · Tier A
  4. [4]AI Runtime Defense | Impart Security PlatformImpart Security · undated page, accessed October 25, 2026 · Tier A
  5. [5]LLM Protection | Deterministic Agent Controls | ImpartImpart Security · undated page, accessed October 25, 2026 · Tier A
  6. [6]MCP Protection | Runtime Control for MCP Layer | ImpartImpart Security · undated page, accessed October 25, 2026 · Tier A
  7. [7]WAF for the Agentic Era | Impart SecurityImpart Security · undated page, accessed October 25, 2026 · Tier A
  8. [8]API Security for the Agentic Era | Impart SecurityImpart Security · undated page, accessed October 25, 2026 · Tier A
  9. [9]Integrations with Impart Security | Impart Security Runtime ProtectionImpart Security · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  10. [10]Programmable Layer 7 Firewall | Impart SecurityImpart Security · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A

Miggo full record

  1. [1]Company Page | MiggoMiggo · undated page, accessed October 23, 2026 · Tier A
  2. [2]miggo.ioMiggo · miggo.io · undated page, accessed October 23, 2026 · Tier A
  3. [3]Financial ServicesMiggo · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  4. [4]Why Miggo's ADR Application Detection and ResponseMiggo · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  5. [5]Miggo | Autonomous Mitigation for Exploitable VulnerabilitiesMiggo · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  6. [6]Security Observability | MiggoMiggo · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  7. [7]Miggo WAF Copilot | Instant Defense Against Next-Gen AI AttacksMiggo · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A

Spot a factual error? Request a correction.