CISO Tribune

Vendor comparison · 4 companies

Impart Security, Lakera, Lasso Security and Prompt Security

Change the companies

Up to four companies side by side.

  • Impart Security
  • Lakera
  • Lasso Security
  • Prompt Security

Four is the most one page holds. Remove or swap a company to add another.

Swipe the table sideways to see every company.

Impart Security, Lakera, Lasso Security and Prompt Security Compared
Impart SecurityImpart Security sells programmable, deterministic Layer 7 protection across AI, applications and APIs.impart.aiLakeraLakera sells AI Red Teaming, AI Agent Security and Workforce AI Security, which together help organizations secure employees, applications, and autonomous agents.lakera.aiLasso SecurityLasso Security sells an AI Security Platform that covers discovery, AI risk assessment and runtime protection.lasso.securityPrompt SecurityPrompt Security offers protection for both employee use of AI tools and the apps an organization builds.prompt.security
What it sells
  • Agent Protection[3][10]Enforces application-specific policies on agent traffic and tool interactions.
  • API Security[5][8][10]Enforces controls based on how APIs behave across requests and sessions.
  • Runtime Defense Harness[10]Uses AI-assisted investigation to develop targeted virtual patches.
  • AI Red Teaming[1][5][6]A continuous workflow to evaluate, scan, and red team AI applications and agents.
  • AI Security Platform[4]Covers discovery, AI risk assessment and runtime protection.
  • Prompt Fuzzer[4]An open source tool for AI vulnerability assessment.
Categories
Headquarters
San Francisco, United StatesZurich, Switzerland[2]Not stated on its pagesNot stated on its pages
Founded
Not stated on its pages2021[2]2023[2]2023[1]
Ownership and funding
Privately heldOwned by Check Point Software Technologies since 2025[3][5]Privately heldOwned by SentinelOne since 2025[3][7][8][10]
Named customers
Not stated on its pagesNot stated on its pagesNot stated on its pagesNot stated on its pages
Recent news
Not stated on its pagesNot stated on its pages
  • September 2, 2026Lasso Security launched an AI guardrail that runs on CPUs only and raised $30 million.[3]
Not stated on its pages
G2 and Gartner Peer Insights
  • G2: Not stated on its pages
  • Gartner Peer Insights: Not stated on its pages
  • G2: Not stated on its pages
  • Gartner Peer Insights: Not stated on its pages
  • G2: Not stated on its pages
  • Gartner Peer Insights: Not stated on its pages
  • G2: listed, seen November 10, 2026[10]
  • Gartner Peer Insights: Not stated on its pages
Who it fits
Impart describes protection that runs inside an organisation's existing ingress. The stated coverage spans AI, applications and APIs. Impart also describes integrating its protection into existing ingress and egress infrastructure, with policies and runtime state synchronized across distributed environments.Lakera describes organizations that run AI across employees, applications, and autonomous agents as the audience for its three AI security products. Lakera positions AI Agent Security for organizations that build and deploy agents. Lakera Guard is sold for LLM applications.From its own pages, Lasso Security describes its AI Security Platform as built for enterprises. Lasso Security addresses security teams that own the AI attack surface, from agent discovery and adversarial testing to runtime enforcement. Lasso Security addresses enterprises whose staff use SaaS and web chatbots, local desktop agents and MCPs across every department.Not written yet
Last verified
September 27, 2026November 2, 2026November 2, 2026September 27, 2026

About Impart Security

Impart Security sells programmable, deterministic Layer 7 protection across AI, applications and APIs. Impart enforces security policies directly in the application traffic path. Impart describes one programmable engine that unifies OWASP coverage, stateful behavioral analysis and custom security logic to block threats inline. Impart defines runtime enforcement as the ability to detect and block a threat at the moment the request is made, inline in the path of live traffic. Impart integrates programmable Layer 7 protection into existing ingress and egress infrastructure, enforces deterministic controls locally, and synchronizes policies and runtime state across distributed environments.[4][6][9][10]

For bots, Impart blocks credential stuffing, scraping and AI-driven automation with stateful controls that evaluate request patterns and session behavior. For agents, Impart enforces application-specific policies on agent traffic and tool interactions, using runtime context to restrict unauthorized actions and access. Impart detects and blocks shadow APIs as they are accessed. Impart's API enforcement prevents sensitive data (PII) from leaving the system.[8][10]

Impart sits between the agent and the customer's systems, enforcing security before any action executes. Agent protection runs on the same ingress-layer enforcement engine that inspects the full attack surface. Impart evaluates each prompt using session history, identity, prior model interactions and the chain of tool calls behind it. Impart's LLM enforcement sits inline between the caller and the model and runs before the prompt reaches inference. Impart builds a live catalog of every MCP server reaching the environment, sanctioned or not, and every tool exposed by each one. Policy-as-code in Impart applies the same way to AI clients, CLI users, web apps and direct API callers.[3][5][6][8]

Runtime Defense Harness uses AI-assisted investigation to develop targeted virtual patches and deploy protection through the same engine already protecting the applications. Impart generates and tests targeted virtual patches against runtime traffic, validating Policy as Code before deployment. Impart deploys custom virtual patches in under 60 minutes. Impart executes custom security logic inline using request context and shared session state, and blocks attacks without model inference in the traffic path.[4][10]

Impart runs inside the existing ingress, without adding an extra traffic hop or single point of failure. A lightweight module runs inside the existing ingress controller, capturing HTTP requests after TLS termination and passing them to a local inspector. If the inspector fails or times out, the module fails open. The Impart inspector runs locally alongside the ingress to evaluate request context, runtime state and custom security logic. Enforcement decisions in Impart are deterministic, and no AI inference or cloud round trip is required. Impart Cloud keeps policies and shared state in sync. Impart extends programmable Layer 7 protection to outbound AI requests and agent interactions through supported AI gateway infrastructure. Impart inspects traffic, applies custom security logic and protects sensitive data without replacing the existing gateway, routing or cost controls. The Impart Security plugin runs natively inside Kong Gateway, paired with an Impart Inspector running in the customer's own environment.[5][9][10]

Impart inspects every request to AI applications, web applications and APIs in the traffic path where it sits. The Impart integration with Wiz sends hosts to a Wiz tenant as Imported Assets, next to the cloud resources. Impart sends hostnames to Wiz and does not read Wiz issues, findings or resources. FanDuel replaced black-box security with Impart. Impart offered Crossbeam a single solution for web application, API security and LLM protection.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]

Impart Security on the record

Sources

Impart Security full record

  1. [1]impart.aiImpart Security · impart.ai · undated page, accessed September 27, 2026 · Tier A
  2. [2]impart.aiImpart Security · impart.ai · undated page, accessed September 27, 2026 · Tier A
  3. [3]Agent Protection - Control AI Agent Behavior | ImpartImpart Security · undated page, accessed September 27, 2026 · Tier A
  4. [4]AI Runtime Defense | Impart Security PlatformImpart Security · undated page, accessed October 25, 2026 · Tier A
  5. [5]LLM Protection | Deterministic Agent Controls | ImpartImpart Security · undated page, accessed October 25, 2026 · Tier A
  6. [6]MCP Protection | Runtime Control for MCP Layer | ImpartImpart Security · undated page, accessed October 25, 2026 · Tier A
  7. [7]WAF for the Agentic Era | Impart SecurityImpart Security · undated page, accessed October 25, 2026 · Tier A
  8. [8]API Security for the Agentic Era | Impart SecurityImpart Security · undated page, accessed October 25, 2026 · Tier A
  9. [9]Integrations with Impart Security | Impart Security Runtime ProtectionImpart Security · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  10. [10]Programmable Layer 7 Firewall | Impart SecurityImpart Security · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A

Lakera full record

  1. [1]Lakera: The AI-Native Security Platform to Accelerate GenAILakera · undated page, accessed September 27, 2026 · Tier A
  2. [2]Check point acquires lakera to deliver end to end ai security for enterprisesCheck Point Software Technologies · checkpoint.com · published September 16, 2025 · Tier A
  3. [3]Check point software reports fourth quarter and 2025 full year resultsCheck Point Software Technologies · checkpoint.com · published February 12, 2026 · Tier A
  4. [4]AI Agent Security Overview | Check Point AI SecurityLakera documentation · undated page, accessed October 26, 2026 · Tier A
  5. [5]Workforce AI Security | Lakera, a Check Point CompanyLakera · undated page, accessed October 26, 2026 · Tier A
  6. [6]AI Red Teaming Services: Expert-led adversarial testingLakera · undated page, accessed October 26, 2026 · Tier A
  7. [7]AI Guardrails Dashboard | Check Point AI SecurityLakera documentation · undated page, accessed October 26, 2026 · Tier A
  8. [8]Secure AI Agents from Discovery to RuntimeLakera · undated page, accessed October 26, 2026 · Tier A
  9. [9]Lakera Launches Open-Source Security Benchmark for LLM Backends in AI AgentsBusiness Wire · published October 28, 2025 · Tier A
  10. [10]Product Peek: Introducing Lakera’s Advanced Content ModerationLakera · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  11. [11]Q4 2025 AI Agent Security TrendsLakera · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  12. [12]AI Security for Product Teams HandbookLakera · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A

Lasso Security full record

  1. [1]Secure AI Adoption at Enterprise Scale | LassoLasso Security · undated page, accessed September 27, 2026 · Tier A
  2. [2]Lasso security announces future of ai security with cpu based guardrailsLasso Security via GlobeNewswire · globenewswire.com · published September 2, 2026 · Tier A
  3. [3]Lasso Security launches CPU-only AI guardrail, raises $30MSiliconANGLE · published September 2, 2026 · Tier B
  4. [4]AI Security Platform for Agents & AI ApplicationsLasso Security · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  5. [5]AI Discovery & AI-BOM for Enterprise SecurityLasso Security · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  6. [6]AI Usage Control for Enterprise Security | Lasso SecurityLasso Security · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  7. [7]AI Security Posture Management | Lasso SecurityLasso Security · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  8. [8]AI Red Teaming | Lasso SecurityLasso Security · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  9. [9]AI Detection & Response | Lasso SecurityLasso Security · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  10. [10]Intent Security for AI Agents | Lasso SecurityLasso Security · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  11. [11]Enterprise AI Agent Security for Copilot, Vertex AI & BedrockLasso Security · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  12. [12]AI Application Security | Lasso SecurityLasso Security · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  13. [13]Information Security Policy & Data ProtectionLasso Security · published February 22, 2024 · Tier A

Prompt Security full record

  1. [1]Prompt security partners with f5 to secure genai applications with a firewall for ai 302131373Prompt Security via PR Newswire · prnewswire.com · published April 30, 2024 · Tier A
  2. [2]Securing ai promptSentinelOne · sentinelone.com · undated page, accessed September 27, 2026 · Tier A
  3. [3]Sentinelone completes acquisition of prompt securitySentinelOne via The Globe and Mail · theglobeandmail.com · published September 5, 2025 · Tier A
  4. [4]Prompt Security | From SentinelOnePrompt Security · undated page, accessed October 27, 2026 · Tier A
  5. [5]AI Security | AI Glossary | Prompt SecurityPrompt Security · undated page, accessed October 27, 2026 · Tier A
  6. [6]ClawSec: A Security Skill Suite for OpenClaw AgentsPrompt Security · undated page, accessed October 27, 2026 · Tier A
  7. [7]AI Security Startups Map — Agentic AI Vendors by CategoryPrompt Security · undated page, accessed October 27, 2026 · Tier A
  8. [8]About this Map & Methodology — AI Security Startups MapPrompt Security · undated page, accessed October 27, 2026 · Tier A
  9. [9]OneClaw DashboardPrompt Security · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  10. [10]Prompt Security Pros and Cons | User Likes & DislikesG2 · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier C

Spot a factual error? Request a correction.