CISO Tribune

Vendor comparison · 2 companies

Bay vs Prompt Security

Bay is an AI agent security platform that gives enterprises visibility into every agent across devices, browsers and cloud workloads, and control over what those agents do in real time. Prompt Security offers protection for both employee use of AI tools and the apps an organization builds. CISO Tribune files both under AI model and agent security and Workforce AI usage security. This page sets the two records side by side: what each sells, where it is based, who owns and funds it, the customers it names and its recent news, each fact numbered to its source.

Change the companies

Up to four companies side by side.

  • Bay
  • Prompt Security
Bay vs Prompt Security: Products, Customers and Funding Compared
BayBay is an AI agent security platform that gives enterprises visibility into every agent across devices, browsers and cloud workloads, and control over what those agents do in real time.bay.ioPrompt SecurityPrompt Security offers protection for both employee use of AI tools and the apps an organization builds.prompt.security
What it sells
  • Bay[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]Bay is an AI agent security platform covering agents on devices, in browsers and in cloud workloads. Bay returns allow, ask, steer or block decisions on agent actions at runtime.
  • Lighthouse[6]Lighthouse is Bay's embedded agentic system that drafts policy from an organization's own agent activity.
  • Wave[3]Wave is the ephemeral binary Bay uses to deploy through an existing MDM or EDR.
  • Prompt Fuzzer[4]An open source tool for AI vulnerability assessment.
Categories
Headquarters
Not stated on its pagesNot stated on its pages
Founded
Not stated on its pages2023[1]
Ownership and funding
Not stated on its pagesOwned by SentinelOne since 2025[3][7][8][10]
Named customers
Not stated on its pagesNot stated on its pages
Recent news
Not stated on its pagesNot stated on its pages
G2 and Gartner Peer Insights
  • G2: Not stated on its pages
  • Gartner Peer Insights: Not stated on its pages
  • G2: listed, seen November 10, 2026[10]
  • Gartner Peer Insights: Not stated on its pages
Who it fits
Not written yetNot written yet
Last verified
November 5, 2026September 27, 2026

Where they overlap

  • Bay and Prompt Security are both filed under AI model and agent security and Workforce AI usage security.

Where they differ, field by field

  • Bay's primary category is AI model and agent security; Prompt Security's is AI firewalls and guardrails.
  • Bay is also filed under Endpoint management and application control.
  • Bay lists Bay, Lighthouse and Wave. Prompt Security lists Prompt Fuzzer.
  • Prompt Security was founded in 2023.
  • Prompt Security is owned by SentinelOne, since 2025.

What it sells: Bay

What Bay does[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]
Bay maps every agent, MCP server, extension, model and skill on devices on its first scan. Bay builds a contextual entity graph of the users, MCP servers, SaaS apps and access connected to each agent. Bay deploys with one script through an existing MDM and does not require a proxy. Bay keeps full transcripts of prompts, actions and MCP calls.
What Lighthouse does[6]
Lighthouse drafts policy from an organization's own agent activity. Users answer 7 questions about risk appetite, and Lighthouse recommends a setting for each question and builds the policy. Bay replays 30 days of agent history to show what a policy would do before enforcement.
What Wave does[3]
Bay is agentless and deploys through an existing MDM or EDR using Wave, an ephemeral binary. There is no persistent agent to maintain and no proxy in the path.

What it sells: Prompt Security

What Prompt Fuzzer does[4]
Prompt Fuzzer is listed under AI Security Tools on the Prompt Security site. The site describes it as an open source tool for AI vulnerability assessment.

Questions about Bay and Prompt Security

What do Bay and Prompt Security sell?
Bay sells Bay, Lighthouse and Wave. Prompt Security sells Prompt Fuzzer.
Are Bay and Prompt Security in the same category?
They share AI model and agent security and Workforce AI usage security. Bay's primary category is AI model and agent security and Prompt Security's is AI firewalls and guardrails.
When were Bay and Prompt Security founded?
Prompt Security was founded in 2023.
Who owns Bay and Prompt Security?
Prompt Security is owned by SentinelOne, since 2025.

About Bay

Bay is an AI agent security platform that gives enterprises visibility into every agent across devices, browsers and cloud workloads, and control over what those agents do in real time. Bay describes AI endpoint security as protection for the AI agents, coding assistants and MCP servers running on employee devices. Bay was founded by three engineers who spent their careers in endpoint and API security. Bay is a Series A stage company.[2][3]

Teams run agents like Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI and GitHub Copilot in clusters, cloud workspaces and hosted sessions.[5]

Bay finds and maps agents first. On the first scan, Bay maps every agent, MCP server, extension, model and skill on devices, including ones nobody approved. Bay finds every agent, extension, CLI tool, MCP server, skill and model on employee devices. Bay builds a contextual entity graph of how everything connects: the user behind each agent, the MCP servers and SaaS apps it touches, and the access it holds. Bay scans every agent, package, extension, MCP server and skill for malicious indicators before approval. In the browser, Bay brings shadow AI into view, covering chatbots, extensions and embedded SaaS agents. In cloud environments, Bay discovers agents across virtual machines, Kubernetes, Coder workspaces and hosted sessions.[1][3][5][6][7]

Lighthouse, Bay's embedded agentic system, drafts policy from an organization's own agent activity. Users answer 7 questions about risk appetite, and Lighthouse recommends a setting for each question and builds the policy. Policies can be scoped by IdP group, device or runtime, and can set which MCP servers can read or write. Before enforcement, Bay replays 30 days of agent history to show what a policy would do before any user is affected. Bay also lets teams run any policy in simulation mode to see what it would allow, ask or block. At runtime, Bay enforces guardrails inline with the agentic action and returns allow, ask, steer or block in milliseconds. Bay can also prevent prompt injection attempts at runtime.[6]

Bay keeps records of agent activity. Bay keeps full transcripts of prompts, actions and MCP calls, traceable to the person behind each session. A metadata-only mode in Bay keeps prompts on the device when they must not leave it. Bay ties every prompt and agent action to a real identity, corporate or personal. Bay logs every policy change and agent action with who approved it and whether a person or an agent took it. Every decision in Bay is logged against the policy behind it, ready for auditors. Bay connects to an identity provider, so every policy applies to the right people and groups.[5][6][7][8]

Bay also checks configuration. Bay checks how every agent and AI tool is set up, across devices and cloud workloads, so risky settings can be fixed before an agent puts them to use. Bay spots bypass-permissions mode, sandboxes switched off and unrestricted tool access, rates how serious each one is and shows how to fix it. Bay finds the credentials, tokens and secrets that agents and MCP servers can read.[9]

Bay deploys with one script through an existing MDM and does not require a proxy to route traffic through. Bay deploys through an existing MDM or EDR using Wave, an ephemeral binary, so there is no persistent agent to maintain. Bay tells corporate AI accounts from personal ones, including in personal Chrome profiles. Bay's enterprise customers include Micron Technology, Peloton and ClickUp.[1][2][3][6][7][8]

Bay on the record

Sources

Bay full record

  1. [1]bay.ioBay · bay.io · undated page, accessed November 5, 2026 · Tier A
  2. [2]Security Researcher — Careers at BayBay · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  3. [3]AI Endpoint Security — BayBay · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  4. [4]About — BayBay · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  5. [5]Cloud Workspaces — BayBay · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  6. [6]Platform — BayBay · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  7. [7]Browser — BayBay · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  8. [8]AI Governance & Compliance — BayBay · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  9. [9]AI Security Posture — BayBay · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A

Prompt Security full record

  1. [1]Prompt security partners with f5 to secure genai applications with a firewall for ai 302131373Prompt Security via PR Newswire · prnewswire.com · published April 30, 2024 · Tier A
  2. [2]Securing ai promptSentinelOne · sentinelone.com · undated page, accessed September 27, 2026 · Tier A
  3. [3]Sentinelone completes acquisition of prompt securitySentinelOne via The Globe and Mail · theglobeandmail.com · published September 5, 2025 · Tier A
  4. [4]Prompt Security | From SentinelOnePrompt Security · undated page, accessed October 27, 2026 · Tier A
  5. [5]AI Security | AI Glossary | Prompt SecurityPrompt Security · undated page, accessed October 27, 2026 · Tier A
  6. [6]ClawSec: A Security Skill Suite for OpenClaw AgentsPrompt Security · undated page, accessed October 27, 2026 · Tier A
  7. [7]AI Security Startups Map — Agentic AI Vendors by CategoryPrompt Security · undated page, accessed October 27, 2026 · Tier A
  8. [8]About this Map & Methodology — AI Security Startups MapPrompt Security · undated page, accessed October 27, 2026 · Tier A
  9. [9]OneClaw DashboardPrompt Security · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  10. [10]Prompt Security Pros and Cons | User Likes & DislikesG2 · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier C

Spot a factual error? Request a correction.