CISO Tribune

Vendor comparison · 2 companies

Archipelo vs Sweet Security

Archipelo develops Salmon, Execution Verification Infrastructure for establishing cryptographically verifiable execution history and state lineage. Sweet Security agents learn how each application, agent and workload should behave. CISO Tribune files both under AI model and agent security. This page sets the two records side by side: what each sells, where it is based, who owns and funds it, the customers it names and its recent news, each fact numbered to its source.

Change the companies

Up to four companies side by side.

  • Archipelo
  • Sweet Security
Archipelo vs Sweet Security: Products, Customers and Funding Compared
ArchipeloArchipelo develops Salmon, Execution Verification Infrastructure for establishing cryptographically verifiable execution history and state lineage.archipelo.comSweet SecuritySweet Security agents learn how each application, agent and workload should behave.sweet.security
What it sells
  • Salmon[1][2][3][4][5]Execution Verification Infrastructure for establishing cryptographically verifiable execution history and state lineage.
  • Cloud Detection and Response (CDR)Sweet Security combines CDR, ADR and CWPP to detect attacks across modern cloud environments.
  • Application Detection and Response (ADR)Sweet Security monitors first- and third-party application behavior at runtime to detect anomalies, unauthorized activity and signs of active exploitation.
Categories
Headquarters
Not stated on its pagesNot stated on its pages
Founded
Not stated on its pagesNot stated on its pages
Ownership and funding
Not stated on its pagesPrivately held[1]
Named customers
Not stated on its pagesNot stated on its pages
Recent news
Not stated on its pagesNot stated on its pages
G2 and Gartner Peer Insights
  • G2: Not stated on its pages
  • Gartner Peer Insights: Not stated on its pages
  • G2: Not stated on its pages
  • Gartner Peer Insights: Not stated on its pages
Who it fits
From its own pages, Archipelo's Salmon addresses software in which autonomous agents, tools, runtimes, and controllers perform consequential actions. Archipelo describes incident investigation teams as needing to work backward from a consequential state change toward the execution associated with it. Archipelo names systems that investigate, evaluate, govern, and depend upon execution as the systems for which verifiable execution history matters.Sweet Security addresses SOC and Incident Response teams that need a picture of incidents across the cloud, workload, and application layers. Sweet Security addresses AppSec teams that want continuous visibility into how applications behave. Sweet Security offers SOC, IR, DevSecOps and AppSec teams integrations across SIEMs, SOARs, alerting and ticketing systems.
Last verified
September 30, 2026November 5, 2026

Where they overlap

  • Archipelo and Sweet Security are both filed under AI model and agent security.

Where they differ, field by field

  • Archipelo's primary category is Software supply chain security; Sweet Security's is Cloud-native application protection (CNAPP).
  • Archipelo is also filed under Insider risk management. Sweet Security is also filed under Cloud detection and response and API security.
  • Archipelo lists Salmon. Sweet Security lists Cloud Detection and Response (CDR) and Application Detection and Response (ADR).
  • Sweet Security is privately held.

What it sells: Archipelo

What Salmon does[1][2][3][4][5]
Salmon is Execution Verification Infrastructure for establishing cryptographically verifiable execution history and state lineage. Execution is represented as a cryptographically signed event with explicit context. Salmon captures execution as it occurs upstream within supported environments.

What it sells: Sweet Security

What Application Detection and Response (ADR) does
Sweet Security analyzes application behavior at the package and function level. Sweet Security can automatically block malicious activity in real time.

Questions about Archipelo and Sweet Security

What do Archipelo and Sweet Security sell?
Archipelo sells Salmon. Sweet Security sells Cloud Detection and Response (CDR) and Application Detection and Response (ADR).
Are Archipelo and Sweet Security in the same category?
They share AI model and agent security. Archipelo's primary category is Software supply chain security and Sweet Security's is Cloud-native application protection (CNAPP).
Who owns Archipelo and Sweet Security?
Sweet Security is privately held.
Who are Archipelo and Sweet Security sold to?
From its own pages, Archipelo's Salmon addresses software in which autonomous agents, tools, runtimes, and controllers perform consequential actions. Sweet Security addresses SOC and Incident Response teams that need a picture of incidents across the cloud, workload, and application layers.

About Archipelo

Archipelo develops Salmon, Execution Verification Infrastructure for establishing cryptographically verifiable execution history and state lineage. Archipelo builds Salmon for autonomous multi-actor software systems. Archipelo, Inc. is the company developing and stewarding Salmon.[1][3][4][5]

Archipelo states that autonomous agents, tools, runtimes, and controllers increasingly perform consequential actions themselves. Archipelo states that the resulting state alone cannot show which execution occurred, in what order, or how each state transition derived from the ones before it. Archipelo develops infrastructure that makes autonomous multi-actor software execution independently verifiable. Archipelo states that safe and reliable agents need verifiable evidence of their execution history.[4][5]

Archipelo points to Git as showing the value of persistent, linked source code history. Archipelo says Execution Verification Infrastructure addresses a different problem, which is establishing a verifiable record of state transitions and the resulting state.

Archipelo describes execution as represented by a cryptographically signed event with explicit context. Archipelo states that Salmon captures execution as it occurs upstream within supported environments, not downstream after the event has already taken place. Archipelo states that Salmon does not visually or structurally manufacture execution continuity when execution continuity has not been established.

Archipelo states that agent generated changes can involve delegated execution, tools, subprocesses and multiple state transitions. Archipelo states that execution history provides a durable record of supported execution relationships to verify outcomes. Archipelo states that during incident investigation, teams need to work backward from a consequential state change toward the execution associated with it, to determine what caused the outcome.

One principle is that downstream systems should not be forced to establish execution history solely through retrospective inference where it can be captured during supported execution. Archipelo states that what an actor was permitted or instructed to do is distinct from what it actually executed. Archipelo states that machine-speed software systems require execution evidence that other software systems can consume and verify. Archipelo describes identity, policy, observability, security, engineering, and governance systems as solving adjacent problems.[5]

Archipelo describes itself as a deep tech company building foundational infrastructure for verifiable autonomous systems.[1][3][4][5]

Archipelo on the record

Sources

Archipelo full record

  1. [1]archipelo.comArchipelo · archipelo.com · undated page, accessed September 30, 2026 · Tier A
  2. [2]Archipelo - Making Autonomous Software Execution VerifiableArchipelo · undated page, accessed October 30, 2026 · Tier A
  3. [3]Terms of Service — SalmonArchipelo, Inc. · published September 20, 2026 · Tier A
  4. [4]Archipelo - This page has been retiredArchipelo · undated page, accessed October 30, 2026 · Tier A
  5. [5]About — SalmonArchipelo · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A

Sweet Security full record

  1. [1]Sweet security raises 75m series b and unveils the first unified runtime cnapp for cloud and ai securitySweet Security · sweet.security · published November 12, 2025 · Tier A
  2. [2]Sweet Security: Autonomous Protection for the AI EnterpriseSweet Security · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  3. [3]Cloud Threat Detection & Response Platform | Sweet SecuritySweet Security · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  4. [4]Cloud Detection & Response for SOC & IR Teams | Sweet SecuritySweet Security · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  5. [5]Cloud Visibility Platform for Hybrid & Multi-Cloud | Sweet SecuritySweet Security · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  6. [6]Enhance Your Defenses Against Identity-Related AttacksSweet Security · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  7. [7]Runtime Vulnerability Management for Cloud Workloads | Sweet SecuritySweet Security · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  8. [8]Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) | Sweet SecuritySweet Security · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  9. [9]API Security Solutions | Protect Your APIs with SweetSweet Security · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  10. [10]AppSec Runtime Security Platform | Sweet SecuritySweet Security · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  11. [11]AI securitySweet Security · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  12. [12]Cloud Security for CloudSec & DevSecOps | Sweet SecuritySweet Security · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  13. [13]Cloud Security for CISOs | Sweet SecuritySweet Security · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A

Spot a factual error? Request a correction.