CISO Tribune

Vendor comparison · 2 companies

Archipelo vs Pillar Security

Archipelo develops Salmon, Execution Verification Infrastructure for establishing cryptographically verifiable execution history and state lineage. Pillar Security sells one platform to discover, test, secure and govern every AI agent across an organization. CISO Tribune files both under AI model and agent security. This page sets the two records side by side: what each sells, where it is based, who owns and funds it, the customers it names and its recent news, each fact numbered to its source.

Change the companies

Up to four companies side by side.

  • Archipelo
  • Pillar Security
Archipelo vs Pillar Security: Products, Customers and Funding Compared
ArchipeloArchipelo develops Salmon, Execution Verification Infrastructure for establishing cryptographically verifiable execution history and state lineage.archipelo.comPillar SecurityPillar Security sells one platform to discover, test, secure and govern every AI agent across an organization.pillar.security
What it sells
  • Salmon[1][2][3][4][5]Execution Verification Infrastructure for establishing cryptographically verifiable execution history and state lineage.
  • Agentic Endpoint[7][10]Protects the AI agents that run on employee machines.
Categories
Headquarters
Not stated on its pagesNot stated on its pages
Founded
Not stated on its pagesNot stated on its pages
Ownership and funding
Not stated on its pagesOwned by Vanta
Named customers
Not stated on its pagesNot stated on its pages
Recent news
Not stated on its pages
  • November 9, 2026Vanta signed a definitive agreement to acquire Pillar Security, an AI security platform that protects AI agents across their lifecycle.[11]
G2 and Gartner Peer Insights
  • G2: Not stated on its pages
  • Gartner Peer Insights: Not stated on its pages
  • G2: Not stated on its pages
  • Gartner Peer Insights: Not stated on its pages
Who it fits
From its own pages, Archipelo's Salmon addresses software in which autonomous agents, tools, runtimes, and controllers perform consequential actions. Archipelo describes incident investigation teams as needing to work backward from a consequential state change toward the execution associated with it. Archipelo names systems that investigate, evaluate, govern, and depend upon execution as the systems for which verifiable execution history matters.Not written yet
Last verified
September 30, 2026November 10, 2026

Where they overlap

  • Archipelo and Pillar Security are both filed under AI model and agent security.

Where they differ, field by field

  • Archipelo's primary category is Software supply chain security; Pillar Security's is AI model and agent security.
  • Archipelo is also filed under Insider risk management. Pillar Security is also filed under AI governance, AI firewalls and guardrails and Workforce AI usage security.
  • Archipelo lists Salmon. Pillar Security lists Agentic Endpoint.
  • Pillar Security is owned by Vanta.

What it sells: Archipelo

What Salmon does[1][2][3][4][5]
Salmon is Execution Verification Infrastructure for establishing cryptographically verifiable execution history and state lineage. Execution is represented as a cryptographically signed event with explicit context. Salmon captures execution as it occurs upstream within supported environments.

What it sells: Pillar Security

What Agentic Endpoint does[7][10]
Pillar deploys through an MDM and inventories the AI coding agents across a fleet: which agents run where, their versions, sandbox state and risk. Runtime Guardian sits in the agent's own pre-tool hook for Claude Code, Codex CLI and Cursor, and decides on every action before it runs. Pillar inventories local and remote servers across a fleet and scores each against a catalog of 23,000+ pre-analyzed servers.

Questions about Archipelo and Pillar Security

What do Archipelo and Pillar Security sell?
Archipelo sells Salmon. Pillar Security sells Agentic Endpoint.
Are Archipelo and Pillar Security in the same category?
They share AI model and agent security. Archipelo's primary category is Software supply chain security and Pillar Security's is AI model and agent security.
Who owns Archipelo and Pillar Security?
Pillar Security is owned by Vanta.
Who are Archipelo and Pillar Security sold to?
From its own pages, Archipelo's Salmon addresses software in which autonomous agents, tools, runtimes, and controllers perform consequential actions.
What have Archipelo and Pillar Security announced recently?
November 9, 2026: Vanta signed a definitive agreement to acquire Pillar Security, an AI security platform that protects AI agents across their lifecycle.

About Archipelo

Archipelo develops Salmon, Execution Verification Infrastructure for establishing cryptographically verifiable execution history and state lineage. Archipelo builds Salmon for autonomous multi-actor software systems. Archipelo, Inc. is the company developing and stewarding Salmon.[1][3][4][5]

Archipelo states that autonomous agents, tools, runtimes, and controllers increasingly perform consequential actions themselves. Archipelo states that the resulting state alone cannot show which execution occurred, in what order, or how each state transition derived from the ones before it. Archipelo develops infrastructure that makes autonomous multi-actor software execution independently verifiable. Archipelo states that safe and reliable agents need verifiable evidence of their execution history.[4][5]

Archipelo points to Git as showing the value of persistent, linked source code history. Archipelo says Execution Verification Infrastructure addresses a different problem, which is establishing a verifiable record of state transitions and the resulting state.

Archipelo describes execution as represented by a cryptographically signed event with explicit context. Archipelo states that Salmon captures execution as it occurs upstream within supported environments, not downstream after the event has already taken place. Archipelo states that Salmon does not visually or structurally manufacture execution continuity when execution continuity has not been established.

Archipelo states that agent generated changes can involve delegated execution, tools, subprocesses and multiple state transitions. Archipelo states that execution history provides a durable record of supported execution relationships to verify outcomes. Archipelo states that during incident investigation, teams need to work backward from a consequential state change toward the execution associated with it, to determine what caused the outcome.

One principle is that downstream systems should not be forced to establish execution history solely through retrospective inference where it can be captured during supported execution. Archipelo states that what an actor was permitted or instructed to do is distinct from what it actually executed. Archipelo states that machine-speed software systems require execution evidence that other software systems can consume and verify. Archipelo describes identity, policy, observability, security, engineering, and governance systems as solving adjacent problems.[5]

Archipelo describes itself as a deep tech company building foundational infrastructure for verifiable autonomous systems.[1][3][4][5]

Archipelo on the record

Sources

Archipelo full record

  1. [1]archipelo.comArchipelo · archipelo.com · undated page, accessed September 30, 2026 · Tier A
  2. [2]Archipelo - Making Autonomous Software Execution VerifiableArchipelo · undated page, accessed October 30, 2026 · Tier A
  3. [3]Terms of Service — SalmonArchipelo, Inc. · published September 20, 2026 · Tier A
  4. [4]Archipelo - This page has been retiredArchipelo · undated page, accessed October 30, 2026 · Tier A
  5. [5]About — SalmonArchipelo · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A

Pillar Security full record

  1. [1]pillar.securityPillar Security · pillar.security · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  2. [2]Pillar Security | Securing the Agentic WorkforcePillar Security · undated page, accessed November 11, 2026 · Tier A
  3. [3]Pillar Security Platform | Securing the Entire AI Software LifecyclePillar Security · undated page, accessed November 11, 2026 · Tier A
  4. [4]AI Discovery & Posture | Pillar SecurityPillar Security · undated page, accessed November 11, 2026 · Tier A
  5. [5]AI Red Teaming & Risk Detection | Pillar SecurityPillar Security · undated page, accessed November 11, 2026 · Tier A
  6. [6]AI Runtime Guardrails | Pillar SecurityPillar Security · undated page, accessed November 11, 2026 · Tier A
  7. [7]Agentic Endpoint: Secure AI Coding Agents | Pillar SecurityPillar Security · undated page, accessed November 11, 2026 · Tier A
  8. [8]AI Security Solutions | Pillar SecurityPillar Security · undated page, accessed November 11, 2026 · Tier A
  9. [9]AI Governance & Compliance | Pillar SecurityPillar Security · undated page, accessed November 11, 2026 · Tier A
  10. [10]Deployment Options: Cloud, Self-Hosted, Hybrid · PillarPillar Security · undated page, accessed November 11, 2026 · Tier A
  11. [11]Vanta to Acquire Pillar Security to Turn AI Policy Into PracticeBusiness Wire · published November 9, 2026 · Tier A

Spot a factual error? Request a correction.