CISO Tribune

Vendor comparison · 2 companies

Archipelo vs P0 Security

Archipelo develops Salmon, Execution Verification Infrastructure for establishing cryptographically verifiable execution history and state lineage. P0 Security sells runtime access control that preserves identity and context while enforcing authorization as sensitive actions are attempted. CISO Tribune files both under AI model and agent security. This page sets the two records side by side: what each sells, where it is based, who owns and funds it, the customers it names and its recent news, each fact numbered to its source.

Change the companies

Up to four companies side by side.

  • Archipelo
  • P0 Security
Archipelo vs P0 Security: Products, Customers and Funding Compared
ArchipeloArchipelo develops Salmon, Execution Verification Infrastructure for establishing cryptographically verifiable execution history and state lineage.archipelo.comP0 SecurityP0 Security sells runtime access control that preserves identity and context while enforcing authorization as sensitive actions are attempted.p0.dev
What it sells
  • Salmon[1][2][3][4][5]Execution Verification Infrastructure for establishing cryptographically verifiable execution history and state lineage.
  • Runtime Access platform[1][3][4]Discovers identities and access paths and authorizes agent, user and machine actions at runtime, granting just-in-time privilege or requiring approval.
  • Runtime Authorization[1][3]Evaluates each requested action against the invoking identity, agent identity and resource entitlements before allowing it to proceed.
  • Authz Control Plane for AgentsExtends the authorization model to AI agents, combining invoking identity, agent identity, tool authorization and resource entitlements into one runtime enforcement model.
  • NHI Lifecycle Management[2]Manages the lifecycle of non-human identities such as service accounts and workloads within the Authz Control Plane.
Categories
Headquarters
Not stated on its pagesNot stated on its pages
Founded
Not stated on its pagesNot stated on its pages
Ownership and funding
Not stated on its pagesNot stated on its pages
Named customers
Not stated on its pagesNot stated on its pages
Recent news
Not stated on its pagesNot stated on its pages
G2 and Gartner Peer Insights
  • G2: Not stated on its pages
  • Gartner Peer Insights: Not stated on its pages
  • G2: listed, seen November 10, 2026[14]
  • Gartner Peer Insights: Not stated on its pages
Who it fits
From its own pages, Archipelo's Salmon addresses software in which autonomous agents, tools, runtimes, and controllers perform consequential actions. Archipelo describes incident investigation teams as needing to work backward from a consequential state change toward the execution associated with it. Archipelo names systems that investigate, evaluate, govern, and depend upon execution as the systems for which verifiable execution history matters.Its pages describe authorization control across multi-cloud and hybrid production environments. The use cases it describes involve developers working with coding agents and SRE teams deploying headless agents that respond to incidents. One case study describes an AI security company that moved developer access under central policy.
Last verified
September 30, 2026November 4, 2026

Where they overlap

  • Archipelo and P0 Security are both filed under AI model and agent security.

Where they differ, field by field

  • Archipelo's primary category is Software supply chain security; P0 Security's is Privileged access management.
  • Archipelo is also filed under Insider risk management. P0 Security is also filed under Non-human identity security and Identity threat detection and response.
  • Archipelo lists Salmon. P0 Security lists Runtime Access platform, Runtime Authorization, Authz Control Plane for Agents and NHI Lifecycle Management.

What it sells: Archipelo

What Salmon does[1][2][3][4][5]
Salmon is Execution Verification Infrastructure for establishing cryptographically verifiable execution history and state lineage. Execution is represented as a cryptographically signed event with explicit context. Salmon captures execution as it occurs upstream within supported environments.

Questions about Archipelo and P0 Security

What do Archipelo and P0 Security sell?
Archipelo sells Salmon. P0 Security sells Runtime Access platform, Runtime Authorization, Authz Control Plane for Agents and NHI Lifecycle Management.
Are Archipelo and P0 Security in the same category?
They share AI model and agent security. Archipelo's primary category is Software supply chain security and P0 Security's is Privileged access management.
Who are Archipelo and P0 Security sold to?
From its own pages, Archipelo's Salmon addresses software in which autonomous agents, tools, runtimes, and controllers perform consequential actions. Its pages describe authorization control across multi-cloud and hybrid production environments.

About Archipelo

Archipelo develops Salmon, Execution Verification Infrastructure for establishing cryptographically verifiable execution history and state lineage. Archipelo builds Salmon for autonomous multi-actor software systems. Archipelo, Inc. is the company developing and stewarding Salmon.[1][3][4][5]

Archipelo states that autonomous agents, tools, runtimes, and controllers increasingly perform consequential actions themselves. Archipelo states that the resulting state alone cannot show which execution occurred, in what order, or how each state transition derived from the ones before it. Archipelo develops infrastructure that makes autonomous multi-actor software execution independently verifiable. Archipelo states that safe and reliable agents need verifiable evidence of their execution history.[4][5]

Archipelo points to Git as showing the value of persistent, linked source code history. Archipelo says Execution Verification Infrastructure addresses a different problem, which is establishing a verifiable record of state transitions and the resulting state.

Archipelo describes execution as represented by a cryptographically signed event with explicit context. Archipelo states that Salmon captures execution as it occurs upstream within supported environments, not downstream after the event has already taken place. Archipelo states that Salmon does not visually or structurally manufacture execution continuity when execution continuity has not been established.

Archipelo states that agent generated changes can involve delegated execution, tools, subprocesses and multiple state transitions. Archipelo states that execution history provides a durable record of supported execution relationships to verify outcomes. Archipelo states that during incident investigation, teams need to work backward from a consequential state change toward the execution associated with it, to determine what caused the outcome.

One principle is that downstream systems should not be forced to establish execution history solely through retrospective inference where it can be captured during supported execution. Archipelo states that what an actor was permitted or instructed to do is distinct from what it actually executed. Archipelo states that machine-speed software systems require execution evidence that other software systems can consume and verify. Archipelo describes identity, policy, observability, security, engineering, and governance systems as solving adjacent problems.[5]

Archipelo describes itself as a deep tech company building foundational infrastructure for verifiable autonomous systems.[1][3][4][5]

Archipelo on the record

Sources

Archipelo full record

  1. [1]archipelo.comArchipelo · archipelo.com · undated page, accessed September 30, 2026 · Tier A
  2. [2]Archipelo - Making Autonomous Software Execution VerifiableArchipelo · undated page, accessed October 30, 2026 · Tier A
  3. [3]Terms of Service — SalmonArchipelo, Inc. · published September 20, 2026 · Tier A
  4. [4]Archipelo - This page has been retiredArchipelo · undated page, accessed October 30, 2026 · Tier A
  5. [5]About — SalmonArchipelo · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A

P0 Security full record

  1. [1]p0.devP0 Security · p0.dev · undated page, accessed November 4, 2026 · Tier A
  2. [2]P0 Security to Showcase Agentic Runtime Access Control Capabilities at Identiverse 2026Business Wire · businesswire.com · published June 15, 2026 · Tier A
  3. [3]Agentic access control - P0 SecurityP0 Security · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  4. [4]How it works - P0 SecurityP0 Security · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  5. [5]P0 Security, runtime access control for all identities - P0 SecurityP0 Security · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  6. [6]Why P0 - P0 SecurityP0 Security · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  7. [7]Four approaches to agentic access control - P0 SecurityP0 Security · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  8. [8]Agentic use cases - P0 SecurityP0 Security · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  9. [9]IAM service account expert - P0 SecurityP0 Security · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  10. [10]Agent-to-agent reporting workflows - P0 SecurityP0 Security · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  11. [11]Coding and SRE agents - P0 SecurityP0 Security · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  12. [12]Autonomous cloud optimization agents - P0 SecurityP0 Security · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  13. [13]Integrations - P0 SecurityP0 Security · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  14. [14]P0 Security Reviews & Product DetailsG2 · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier C

Spot a factual error? Request a correction.