CISO Tribune

Vendor comparison · 2 companies

Archipelo vs Neo

Archipelo develops Salmon, Execution Verification Infrastructure for establishing cryptographically verifiable execution history and state lineage. Neo sells security for AI and agentic software across every endpoint, SaaS app, and cloud service. CISO Tribune files both under Software supply chain security and AI model and agent security. This page sets the two records side by side: what each sells, where it is based, who owns and funds it, the customers it names and its recent news, each fact numbered to its source.

Change the companies

Up to four companies side by side.

  • Archipelo
  • Neo
Archipelo vs Neo: Products, Customers and Funding Compared
ArchipeloArchipelo develops Salmon, Execution Verification Infrastructure for establishing cryptographically verifiable execution history and state lineage.archipelo.comNeoNeo sells security for AI and agentic software across every endpoint, SaaS app, and cloud service.neo.ai
What it sells
  • Salmon[1][2][3][4][5]Execution Verification Infrastructure for establishing cryptographically verifiable execution history and state lineage.
  • Neo Node[3][5][6]Enforces policy on the laptop, on macOS, Windows, and Linux. Decides each agent action with allow, ask, or block.
  • Neo Console[6]Starts from a customer's organization and its teams, taken from the identity provider.
  • Neoverse[1][3][5][6]The intelligence layer for AI apps and tools.
Categories
Headquarters
Not stated on its pagesNot stated on its pages
Founded
Not stated on its pagesNot stated on its pages
Ownership and funding
Not stated on its pagesPrivately held[3]
Named customers
Not stated on its pagesNot stated on its pages
Recent news
Not stated on its pages
  • July 20, 2026Neo emerged from stealth with $100 million in funding from Andreessen Horowitz, Bessemer Venture Partners, Craft Ventures and Merlin Ventures.[7]
G2 and Gartner Peer Insights
  • G2: Not stated on its pages
  • Gartner Peer Insights: Not stated on its pages
  • G2: Not stated on its pages
  • Gartner Peer Insights: Not stated on its pages
Who it fits
From its own pages, Archipelo's Salmon addresses software in which autonomous agents, tools, runtimes, and controllers perform consequential actions. Archipelo describes incident investigation teams as needing to work backward from a consequential state change toward the execution associated with it. Archipelo names systems that investigate, evaluate, govern, and depend upon execution as the systems for which verifiable execution history matters.From its own pages, the company sells mainly to organisations that need to know which AI agents run on their fleet and what each one can reach. Neo describes examples from a healthcare SaaS company and a fintech. Neo Node deploys through an MDM that the customer already runs. Neo Console takes the organization and its teams from the customer's identity provider. Neo enforces policy on laptops running macOS, Windows, and Linux, and extends the same policy to SaaS apps and cloud deployments.
Last verified
September 30, 2026November 9, 2026

Where they overlap

  • Archipelo and Neo are both filed under Software supply chain security and AI model and agent security.

Where they differ, field by field

  • Archipelo's primary category is Software supply chain security; Neo's is AI model and agent security.
  • Archipelo is also filed under Insider risk management. Neo is also filed under Workforce AI usage security and AI governance.
  • Archipelo lists Salmon. Neo lists Neo Node, Neo Console and Neoverse.
  • Neo is privately held.

What it sells: Archipelo

What Salmon does[1][2][3][4][5]
Salmon is Execution Verification Infrastructure for establishing cryptographically verifiable execution history and state lineage. Execution is represented as a cryptographically signed event with explicit context. Salmon captures execution as it occurs upstream within supported environments.

What it sells: Neo

What Neo Node does[3][5][6]
Neo Node deploys through the MDM a customer already runs, with no kernel module and no reboot. Neo Node reads the whole session rather than only the command. Inside Claude Code, Neo Node reads the model, MCP servers, skills and plugins that Claude Code loads.
What Neoverse does[1][3][5][6]
Neoverse checks every extension, package, skill, and MCP server before it runs. Neoverse rates an unsigned server loaded by an agent as Unsafe on first sight.

Questions about Archipelo and Neo

What do Archipelo and Neo sell?
Archipelo sells Salmon. Neo sells Neo Node, Neo Console and Neoverse.
Are Archipelo and Neo in the same category?
They share Software supply chain security and AI model and agent security. Archipelo's primary category is Software supply chain security and Neo's is AI model and agent security.
Who owns Archipelo and Neo?
Neo is privately held.
Who are Archipelo and Neo sold to?
From its own pages, Archipelo's Salmon addresses software in which autonomous agents, tools, runtimes, and controllers perform consequential actions. From its own pages, the company sells mainly to organisations that need to know which AI agents run on their fleet and what each one can reach.
What have Archipelo and Neo announced recently?
July 20, 2026: Neo emerged from stealth with $100 million in funding from Andreessen Horowitz, Bessemer Venture Partners, Craft Ventures and Merlin Ventures.

About Archipelo

Archipelo develops Salmon, Execution Verification Infrastructure for establishing cryptographically verifiable execution history and state lineage. Archipelo builds Salmon for autonomous multi-actor software systems. Archipelo, Inc. is the company developing and stewarding Salmon.[1][3][4][5]

Archipelo states that autonomous agents, tools, runtimes, and controllers increasingly perform consequential actions themselves. Archipelo states that the resulting state alone cannot show which execution occurred, in what order, or how each state transition derived from the ones before it. Archipelo develops infrastructure that makes autonomous multi-actor software execution independently verifiable. Archipelo states that safe and reliable agents need verifiable evidence of their execution history.[4][5]

Archipelo points to Git as showing the value of persistent, linked source code history. Archipelo says Execution Verification Infrastructure addresses a different problem, which is establishing a verifiable record of state transitions and the resulting state.

Archipelo describes execution as represented by a cryptographically signed event with explicit context. Archipelo states that Salmon captures execution as it occurs upstream within supported environments, not downstream after the event has already taken place. Archipelo states that Salmon does not visually or structurally manufacture execution continuity when execution continuity has not been established.

Archipelo states that agent generated changes can involve delegated execution, tools, subprocesses and multiple state transitions. Archipelo states that execution history provides a durable record of supported execution relationships to verify outcomes. Archipelo states that during incident investigation, teams need to work backward from a consequential state change toward the execution associated with it, to determine what caused the outcome.

One principle is that downstream systems should not be forced to establish execution history solely through retrospective inference where it can be captured during supported execution. Archipelo states that what an actor was permitted or instructed to do is distinct from what it actually executed. Archipelo states that machine-speed software systems require execution evidence that other software systems can consume and verify. Archipelo describes identity, policy, observability, security, engineering, and governance systems as solving adjacent problems.[5]

Archipelo describes itself as a deep tech company building foundational infrastructure for verifiable autonomous systems.[1][3][4][5]

Archipelo on the record

Sources

Archipelo full record

  1. [1]archipelo.comArchipelo · archipelo.com · undated page, accessed September 30, 2026 · Tier A
  2. [2]Archipelo - Making Autonomous Software Execution VerifiableArchipelo · undated page, accessed October 30, 2026 · Tier A
  3. [3]Terms of Service — SalmonArchipelo, Inc. · published September 20, 2026 · Tier A
  4. [4]Archipelo - This page has been retiredArchipelo · undated page, accessed October 30, 2026 · Tier A
  5. [5]About — SalmonArchipelo · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A

Neo full record

  1. [1]Neo launches with 100m to secure ai software across the enterpriseGlobeNewswire · globenewswire.com · published July 20, 2026 · Tier A
  2. [2]neo.aiNeo · neo.ai · undated page, accessed November 9, 2026 · Tier A
  3. [3]Neo | Secure AI. From Endpoint to EverywhereNeo · undated page, accessed November 11, 2026 · Tier A
  4. [4]Platform | NeoNeo · undated page, accessed November 11, 2026 · Tier A
  5. [5]Why Neo | AI Control Starts at the EndpointNeo · undated page, accessed November 11, 2026 · Tier A
  6. [6]How It Works | NeoNeo · undated page, accessed November 11, 2026 · Tier A
  7. [7]Neo Launches With $100M for AI Software SecurityNeo · published July 20, 2026 · Tier A

Spot a factual error? Request a correction.