CISO Tribune

Vendor comparison · 2 companies

Archipelo vs Enkrypt AI

Archipelo develops Salmon, Execution Verification Infrastructure for establishing cryptographically verifiable execution history and state lineage. Enkrypt AI sells an AI security platform with products for red teaming agents, enforcing runtime guardrails, turning policy into controls, auditing AI data, and scanning and gating MCP tool traffic. CISO Tribune files both under AI model and agent security. This page sets the two records side by side: what each sells, where it is based, who owns and funds it, the customers it names and its recent news, each fact numbered to its source.

Change the companies

Up to four companies side by side.

  • Archipelo
  • Enkrypt AI
Archipelo vs Enkrypt AI: Products, Customers and Funding Compared
ArchipeloArchipelo develops Salmon, Execution Verification Infrastructure for establishing cryptographically verifiable execution history and state lineage.archipelo.comEnkrypt AIEnkrypt AI sells an AI security platform with products for red teaming agents, enforcing runtime guardrails, turning policy into controls, auditing AI data, and scanning and gating MCP tool traffic.enkryptai.com
What it sells
  • Salmon[1][2][3][4][5]Execution Verification Infrastructure for establishing cryptographically verifiable execution history and state lineage.
  • AI Data Risk Audit[1][6]Produces a sign-off packet for Security and Legal on the data an AI system uses.
  • MCP Gateway[1][4][8]Open-source control plane that sits inline between agents and MCP servers.
Categories
Headquarters
Not stated on its pagesBrighton, United States
Founded
Not stated on its pages2022[2]
Ownership and funding
Not stated on its pagesPrivately held[1][7]
Named customers
Not stated on its pagesNot stated on its pages
Recent news
Not stated on its pagesNot stated on its pages
G2 and Gartner Peer Insights
  • G2: Not stated on its pages
  • Gartner Peer Insights: Not stated on its pages
  • G2: Not stated on its pages
  • Gartner Peer Insights: Not stated on its pages
Who it fits
From its own pages, Archipelo's Salmon addresses software in which autonomous agents, tools, runtimes, and controllers perform consequential actions. Archipelo describes incident investigation teams as needing to work backward from a consequential state change toward the execution associated with it. Archipelo names systems that investigate, evaluate, govern, and depend upon execution as the systems for which verifiable execution history matters.From its own pages, Enkrypt AI sells mainly to teams shipping customer-facing chat or voice agents in regulated industries such as Finance, Healthcare, Insurance, and Government. Its pricing describes plans for startups launching AI, small teams, growing companies with multiple agents, and large enterprises in regulated industries needing VPC or on-prem deployment. Enkrypt AI states that its release packet is meant to give Security, Legal, and Product what they need to approve an agent. Teams adopting MCP are named as a stated audience for its MCP products.
Last verified
September 30, 2026November 9, 2026

Where they overlap

  • Archipelo and Enkrypt AI are both filed under AI model and agent security.

Where they differ, field by field

  • Archipelo's primary category is Software supply chain security; Enkrypt AI's is AI model and agent security.
  • Archipelo is also filed under Insider risk management. Enkrypt AI is also filed under AI firewalls and guardrails and AI governance.
  • Archipelo lists Salmon. Enkrypt AI lists AI Data Risk Audit and MCP Gateway.
  • Enkrypt AI is headquartered in Brighton, United States.
  • Enkrypt AI was founded in 2022.
  • Enkrypt AI is privately held.

What it sells: Archipelo

What Salmon does[1][2][3][4][5]
Salmon is Execution Verification Infrastructure for establishing cryptographically verifiable execution history and state lineage. Execution is represented as a cryptographically signed event with explicit context. Salmon captures execution as it occurs upstream within supported environments.

What it sells: Enkrypt AI

What AI Data Risk Audit does[1][6]
Enkrypt AI Data Risk Audit evaluates the datasets a customer brings for a specific AI system and intended use. Intended uses include TRAIN, RAG, and EVAL. Enkrypt AI Data Risk Audit works across text, audio and images, in multiple languages. It is re-run when datasets or connectors change.
What MCP Gateway does[1][4][8]
MCP Gateway approves, modifies, or blocks tool calls. MCP Gateway runs as a sidecar or gateway in the tool path. Enkrypt AI adds enterprise capabilities such as centralized policy management, tenant-aware enforcement, reporting, and support.

Questions about Archipelo and Enkrypt AI

What do Archipelo and Enkrypt AI sell?
Archipelo sells Salmon. Enkrypt AI sells AI Data Risk Audit and MCP Gateway.
Are Archipelo and Enkrypt AI in the same category?
They share AI model and agent security. Archipelo's primary category is Software supply chain security and Enkrypt AI's is AI model and agent security.
Where are Archipelo and Enkrypt AI headquartered?
Enkrypt AI is headquartered in Brighton, United States.
When were Archipelo and Enkrypt AI founded?
Enkrypt AI was founded in 2022.
Who owns Archipelo and Enkrypt AI?
Enkrypt AI is privately held.
Who are Archipelo and Enkrypt AI sold to?
From its own pages, Archipelo's Salmon addresses software in which autonomous agents, tools, runtimes, and controllers perform consequential actions. From its own pages, Enkrypt AI sells mainly to teams shipping customer-facing chat or voice agents in regulated industries such as Finance, Healthcare, Insurance, and Government.

About Archipelo

Archipelo develops Salmon, Execution Verification Infrastructure for establishing cryptographically verifiable execution history and state lineage. Archipelo builds Salmon for autonomous multi-actor software systems. Archipelo, Inc. is the company developing and stewarding Salmon.[1][3][4][5]

Archipelo states that autonomous agents, tools, runtimes, and controllers increasingly perform consequential actions themselves. Archipelo states that the resulting state alone cannot show which execution occurred, in what order, or how each state transition derived from the ones before it. Archipelo develops infrastructure that makes autonomous multi-actor software execution independently verifiable. Archipelo states that safe and reliable agents need verifiable evidence of their execution history.[4][5]

Archipelo points to Git as showing the value of persistent, linked source code history. Archipelo says Execution Verification Infrastructure addresses a different problem, which is establishing a verifiable record of state transitions and the resulting state.

Archipelo describes execution as represented by a cryptographically signed event with explicit context. Archipelo states that Salmon captures execution as it occurs upstream within supported environments, not downstream after the event has already taken place. Archipelo states that Salmon does not visually or structurally manufacture execution continuity when execution continuity has not been established.

Archipelo states that agent generated changes can involve delegated execution, tools, subprocesses and multiple state transitions. Archipelo states that execution history provides a durable record of supported execution relationships to verify outcomes. Archipelo states that during incident investigation, teams need to work backward from a consequential state change toward the execution associated with it, to determine what caused the outcome.

One principle is that downstream systems should not be forced to establish execution history solely through retrospective inference where it can be captured during supported execution. Archipelo states that what an actor was permitted or instructed to do is distinct from what it actually executed. Archipelo states that machine-speed software systems require execution evidence that other software systems can consume and verify. Archipelo describes identity, policy, observability, security, engineering, and governance systems as solving adjacent problems.[5]

Archipelo describes itself as a deep tech company building foundational infrastructure for verifiable autonomous systems.[1][3][4][5]

Archipelo on the record

Sources

Archipelo full record

  1. [1]archipelo.comArchipelo · archipelo.com · undated page, accessed September 30, 2026 · Tier A
  2. [2]Archipelo - Making Autonomous Software Execution VerifiableArchipelo · undated page, accessed October 30, 2026 · Tier A
  3. [3]Terms of Service — SalmonArchipelo, Inc. · published September 20, 2026 · Tier A
  4. [4]Archipelo - This page has been retiredArchipelo · undated page, accessed October 30, 2026 · Tier A
  5. [5]About — SalmonArchipelo · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A

Enkrypt AI full record

  1. [1]Enkrypt AI | World's Most Comprehensive AI Security PlatformEnkrypt AI · undated page, accessed September 27, 2026 · Tier A
  2. [2]MultimodalaisecurityEnkrypt AI · enkryptai.com · undated page, accessed September 27, 2026 · Tier A
  3. [3]Enkrypt AI Agent Red TeamingEnkrypt AI · undated page, accessed November 6, 2026 · Tier A
  4. [4]Enkrypt AI Agent Guardrails | Secure AI Agents EffortlesslyEnkrypt AI · undated page, accessed November 6, 2026 · Tier A
  5. [5]Enkrypt AI Agent Policy Engine | Secure & Control AI Agents EffortlesslyEnkrypt AI · undated page, accessed November 6, 2026 · Tier A
  6. [6]Enkrypt AI Data Risk Audit | Secure Your AI Data NowEnkrypt AI · undated page, accessed November 6, 2026 · Tier A
  7. [7]Enkrypt AI MCP Scanner: Advanced AI Threat Detection & SecurityEnkrypt AI · undated page, accessed November 6, 2026 · Tier A
  8. [8]Enkrypt AI MCP Gateway | Inline Policy Control for MCP Tool TrafficEnkrypt AI · undated page, accessed November 6, 2026 · Tier A
  9. [9]Secure Customer-Facing Agents | Enkrypt AI Compliance & ReleaseEnkrypt AI · undated page, accessed November 6, 2026 · Tier A
  10. [10]Industry | Enkrypt AIEnkrypt AI · undated page, accessed November 6, 2026 · Tier A
  11. [11]Pricing | Enkrypt AIEnkrypt AI · undated page, accessed November 6, 2026 · Tier A

Spot a factual error? Request a correction.