CISO Tribune

Vendor comparison · 2 companies

Archer vs Neo

Archer sells a governance, risk and compliance platform that connects enterprise risk, compliance, audit, AI governance, ESG, third-party risk and resilience on shared data and one reporting layer. Neo sells security for AI and agentic software across every endpoint, SaaS app, and cloud service. CISO Tribune files both under AI governance. This page sets the two records side by side: what each sells, where it is based, who owns and funds it, the customers it names and its recent news, each fact numbered to its source.

Change the companies

Up to four companies side by side.

  • Archer
  • Neo
Archer vs Neo: Products, Customers and Funding Compared
ArcherArcher sells a governance, risk and compliance platform that connects enterprise risk, compliance, audit, AI governance, ESG, third-party risk and resilience on shared data and one reporting layer.archerirm.comNeoNeo sells security for AI and agentic software across every endpoint, SaaS app, and cloud service.neo.ai
What it sells
  • IT & Security Risk Management[1]A module that helps organizations manage IT and security risk within the Archer platform.
  • AI Governance[1][2]A module for governing the use and risk of artificial intelligence within an organization.
  • Third-Party Governance[1]A module that manages risk related to third-party vendors and suppliers.
  • Audit Management[1]A module that supports internal audit processes and documentation.
  • Enterprise & Operational Risk[1]A module for tracking and managing enterprise-wide and operational risks.
  • Regulatory & Corporate Compliance[1]A module that helps organizations manage regulatory and corporate compliance obligations.
  • Neo Node[3][5][6]Enforces policy on the laptop, on macOS, Windows, and Linux. Decides each agent action with allow, ask, or block.
  • Neo Console[6]Starts from a customer's organization and its teams, taken from the identity provider.
  • Neoverse[1][3][5][6]The intelligence layer for AI apps and tools.
Categories
Headquarters
Not stated on its pagesNot stated on its pages
Founded
Not stated on its pagesNot stated on its pages
Ownership and funding
Not stated on its pagesPrivately held[3]
Named customers
Not stated on its pagesNot stated on its pages
Recent news
Not stated on its pages
  • July 20, 2026Neo emerged from stealth with $100 million in funding from Andreessen Horowitz, Bessemer Venture Partners, Craft Ventures and Merlin Ventures.[7]
G2 and Gartner Peer Insights
  • G2: Not stated on its pages
  • Gartner Peer Insights: Not stated on its pages
  • G2: Not stated on its pages
  • Gartner Peer Insights: Not stated on its pages
Who it fits
Archer states that it delivers enterprise capabilities for companies of all sizes. Archer says its products are designed to meet the needs of GRC teams and business users, and its IT risk material describes roles from IT risk analyst to enterprise risk officer. Archer Evolv can be deployed on-premises or as SaaS.From its own pages, the company sells mainly to organisations that need to know which AI agents run on their fleet and what each one can reach. Neo describes examples from a healthcare SaaS company and a fintech. Neo Node deploys through an MDM that the customer already runs. Neo Console takes the organization and its teams from the customer's identity provider. Neo enforces policy on laptops running macOS, Windows, and Linux, and extends the same policy to SaaS apps and cloud deployments.
Last verified
November 2, 2026November 9, 2026

Where they overlap

  • Archer and Neo are both filed under AI governance.

Where they differ, field by field

  • Archer's primary category is GRC and integrated risk platforms; Neo's is AI model and agent security.
  • Archer is also filed under Third-party risk and security ratings. Neo is also filed under Workforce AI usage security and Software supply chain security.
  • Archer lists IT & Security Risk Management, AI Governance, Third-Party Governance, Audit Management, Enterprise & Operational Risk and 1 more. Neo lists Neo Node, Neo Console and Neoverse.
  • Neo is privately held.

What it sells: Neo

What Neo Node does[3][5][6]
Neo Node deploys through the MDM a customer already runs, with no kernel module and no reboot. Neo Node reads the whole session rather than only the command. Inside Claude Code, Neo Node reads the model, MCP servers, skills and plugins that Claude Code loads.
What Neoverse does[1][3][5][6]
Neoverse checks every extension, package, skill, and MCP server before it runs. Neoverse rates an unsigned server loaded by an agent as Unsafe on first sight.

Questions about Archer and Neo

What do Archer and Neo sell?
Archer sells IT & Security Risk Management, AI Governance, Third-Party Governance, Audit Management, Enterprise & Operational Risk and 1 more. Neo sells Neo Node, Neo Console and Neoverse.
Are Archer and Neo in the same category?
They share AI governance. Archer's primary category is GRC and integrated risk platforms and Neo's is AI model and agent security.
Who owns Archer and Neo?
Neo is privately held.
Who are Archer and Neo sold to?
Archer states that it delivers enterprise capabilities for companies of all sizes. From its own pages, the company sells mainly to organisations that need to know which AI agents run on their fleet and what each one can reach.
What have Archer and Neo announced recently?
July 20, 2026: Neo emerged from stealth with $100 million in funding from Andreessen Horowitz, Bessemer Venture Partners, Craft Ventures and Merlin Ventures.

About Archer

Archer sells a governance, risk and compliance platform that connects enterprise risk, compliance, audit, AI governance, ESG, third-party risk and resilience on shared data and one reporting layer. Archer brings risk, controls, obligations and evidence into one governed system. Archer says regulatory change moves faster than teams can interpret, assess and operationalize it. More than 1,500 organizations run on Archer, including half the Fortune 500.[2][3]

Archer Evolv adds AI-powered intelligence to an existing GRC program and connects regulatory change obligations, controls, policies and assurance evidence. Archer Evolv can be deployed standalone or alongside Archer GRC, on-premises or SaaS. Archer describes a system of record, a system of intelligence and a system of outcomes as one connected foundation that uses existing permissions and audit trail. Archer Evolv turns data from the GRC environment into governed intelligence with AI operators.[3][6]

Workplace is where Evolv operators run, and each operator handles one governed task, such as mapping a new obligation to the controls it touches. In Archer, a reviewer approves the result of an operator before it reaches the customer's controls. Archer Evolv operators run third-party reviews end to end, monitor vendors between assessments and enforce the customer's requirements. Archer Evolv operators monitor technology risks, controls and issues, enforce the customer's standards and rank what needs attention first. Archer monitors 8,000+ regulatory sources across 180 jurisdictions, from SEC and FINRA to DORA, and flags what applies to a business.[3][4]

Archer Evolv assesses each citation against a customer's jurisdictions, products and legal entities. A wizard in Archer captures a customer's jurisdictions, entities, products and themes, and assesses each incoming citation against that profile. Archer parses citations, rulebooks, statutes and a customer's own policies into discrete obligations, each linked to its type, its theme and its source citation. Archer clusters up to 10,000 obligations per assessment by meaning. Archer compares a customer's obligations against the controls it already holds, names the gaps and conflicts and proposes a resolution. Archer Evolv extracts obligations, maps them to controls and business units, routes the assessment to named owners and publishes the result into Archer.[5]

Archer turns regulations and a customer's policies into live AWS Bedrock guardrails that are enforced before the model is invoked. Guardrails are deployed as drafts and go live only after the customer approves them. Traffic is evaluated against guardrails before inference inside the customer's AWS account, and violations are blocked and logged as a governed control breach. Every deployed guardrail is tested on a cycle against the control the customer approved. Findings from each violation route into Archer issue management workflows. Prompt content, model responses, documents, embeddings, customer PII and model weights do not reach Archer, and only the violation event does.[6]

Archer's IT and security risk offering has nine interconnected use cases with workflows that move findings and controls from assessment through closure. Archer's IT risk register catalogs the organization and its IT assets and logs each IT risk against the systems it touches. Archer tests IT controls on a project schedule and pulls in results from automated systems. Archer ranks threats and vulnerabilities by what they put at risk in the business, using asset context and scan results. Archer ships current security frameworks and control catalogs with the use case, including the ISO 27000 series, COBIT 5, the NIST 800 series and PCI DSS. Archer rolls test results up to the primary control and reports compliance for each control set separately. Archer stores evidence in a versioned repository as tests run, tied to the control and the standard it serves.[7][8]

Archer gives financial institutions one connected view of obligations, controls and risk. Archer connects regulatory compliance, third-party risk, operational risk and IT security in one system. Archer helps government agencies unify FedRAMP, CMMC and FISMA obligations. Every control in Archer links back to the exact FedRAMP, CMMC or FISMA requirement it satisfies, and every AI output goes through Expert-in-the-Loop review. Archer tests controls against live evidence, flags a gap as it appears, routes it to an owner and keeps a time-stamped record. Archer translates risk into financial terms based on modeled loss exposure and stated assumptions. Archer states SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 and describes 25+ years as a system of record. The Archer Vulnerability Response Team coordinates the response and disclosure for all product vulnerabilities reported to Archer.[2][3][4][6][7][8][9][10]

Archer on the record

Sources

Archer full record

  1. [1]archerirm.comArcher · archerirm.com · undated page, accessed November 2, 2026 · Tier A
  2. [2]About Archer – GRC & Risk Management Solutions | ArcherArcher · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  3. [3]Archer® | Regulatory Change ManagementArcher · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  4. [4]Financial Services | ArcherArcher · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  5. [5]Archer Evolv Compliance for AI-Powered Enterprise ComplianceArcher · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  6. [6]Archer Evolv™ AI Compliance | ArcherArcher · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  7. [7]IT & Security Risk Management | ArcherArcher · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  8. [8]Archer Regulatory & Corporate Compliance ManagementArcher · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  9. [9]Government GRC Solutions | ArcherArcher · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  10. [10]Vulnerability Response Policy | ArcherArcher · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A

Neo full record

  1. [1]Neo launches with 100m to secure ai software across the enterpriseGlobeNewswire · globenewswire.com · published July 20, 2026 · Tier A
  2. [2]neo.aiNeo · neo.ai · undated page, accessed November 9, 2026 · Tier A
  3. [3]Neo | Secure AI. From Endpoint to EverywhereNeo · undated page, accessed November 11, 2026 · Tier A
  4. [4]Platform | NeoNeo · undated page, accessed November 11, 2026 · Tier A
  5. [5]Why Neo | AI Control Starts at the EndpointNeo · undated page, accessed November 11, 2026 · Tier A
  6. [6]How It Works | NeoNeo · undated page, accessed November 11, 2026 · Tier A
  7. [7]Neo Launches With $100M for AI Software SecurityNeo · published July 20, 2026 · Tier A

Spot a factual error? Request a correction.