CISO Tribune

Vendor comparison · 2 companies

Apiiro vs Mindgard

Apiiro offers Guardian Agent, which protects coding agents, prevents risk and AutoFixes backlogs, powered by the Apiiro Context Graph. Mindgard secures AI models, agents, and applications against exploitable threats. CISO Tribune files both under AI model and agent security. This page sets the two records side by side: what each sells, where it is based, who owns and funds it, the customers it names and its recent news, each fact numbered to its source.

Change the companies

Up to four companies side by side.

  • Apiiro
  • Mindgard
Apiiro vs Mindgard: Products, Customers and Funding Compared
ApiiroApiiro offers Guardian Agent, which protects coding agents, prevents risk and AutoFixes backlogs, powered by the Apiiro Context Graph.apiiro.comMindgardMindgard secures AI models, agents, and applications against exploitable threats.mindgard.ai
What it sells
  • AI-SAST[9]Static analysis that uses context from the customer's software graph and business risk to detect vulnerabilities.
  • AI-SCA[10]Open source security that moves from CVE matching to risk validation and fix.
  • AI Red Teaming[1][4][6][10]Mindgard's agentic platform red teams AI systems, agents, and infrastructure.
  • AI Security Expert[9]A subscription that gives a team direct access to a specialist.
Categories
Headquarters
Not stated on its pagesBoston, United States[2]
Founded
Not stated on its pages2022[2][3]
Ownership and funding
Not stated on its pagesPrivately held[2][3]
Named customers
Not stated on its pagesNot stated on its pages
Recent news
Not stated on its pages
  • August 13, 2026Mindgard announced a $30M Series A funding round.[11]
  • March 17, 2026Mindgard announced an expansion of its AI security platform that adds a reconnaissance capability for AI models, agents and applications.[12]
G2 and Gartner Peer Insights
  • G2: listed, seen November 10, 2026[15]
  • Gartner Peer Insights: Not stated on its pages
  • G2: Not stated on its pages
  • Gartner Peer Insights: Not stated on its pages
Who it fits
From its own pages, Apiiro presents Guardian Agent as delivering outcomes for CISOs and CTOs. In our reading, the Apiiro Context Graph is aimed at application security, development and compliance teams working alongside coding agents. Apiiro gives maintainers free AutoFix.Mindgard addresses organizations that secure the AI systems they build, buy and use. The offering is aimed at pen-testers who scale AI-focused security testing efforts, and at developers who integrate ongoing testing for secure AI deployments. Customer types shown include global insurance brokerages, healthcare AI platforms, global financial institutions, semiconductor manufacturers and enterprise technology services. Reporting is directed to security, engineering, GRC, and audit teams.
Last verified
November 3, 2026September 27, 2026

Where they overlap

  • Apiiro and Mindgard are both filed under AI model and agent security.

Where they differ, field by field

  • Apiiro's primary category is Application security posture management; Mindgard's is AI model and agent security.
  • Apiiro is also filed under Software composition analysis and Software supply chain security. Mindgard is also filed under AI firewalls and guardrails.
  • Apiiro lists AI-SAST and AI-SCA. Mindgard lists AI Red Teaming and AI Security Expert.
  • Mindgard is headquartered in Boston, United States.
  • Mindgard was founded in 2022.
  • Mindgard is privately held.

What it sells: Apiiro

What AI-SAST does[9]
AI-SAST shifts static analysis from a detection problem to a risk validation and fix problem. AI-powered SAST uses context from the customer's software graph and business risk to detect vulnerabilities, validate true positives and identify false positives. Deep Code Analysis builds the Software Graph across files, code modules, repositories and code owners, updated on every commit.
What AI-SCA does[10]
AI-SCA shifts open source security from CVE matching to risk validation and fix. Contextual analysis decides whether a vulnerability is used in code, internet exposed and exploitable. Malicious packages, license conflicts and AI components are covered beyond CVEs. Dependency scanning reaches the leaf node, covering direct, transitive and custom-built internal dependencies.

What it sells: Mindgard

What AI Security Expert does[9]
The expert shows how to run posture assessments, enhance tooling usage, build adversarial skills, and co-pilot red teaming efforts. The subscription includes workshops that show security and data science teams how adversarial techniques work, how agentic systems fail, and how defensive controls can be applied.

Questions about Apiiro and Mindgard

What do Apiiro and Mindgard sell?
Apiiro sells AI-SAST and AI-SCA. Mindgard sells AI Red Teaming and AI Security Expert.
Are Apiiro and Mindgard in the same category?
They share AI model and agent security. Apiiro's primary category is Application security posture management and Mindgard's is AI model and agent security.
Where are Apiiro and Mindgard headquartered?
Mindgard is headquartered in Boston, United States.
When were Apiiro and Mindgard founded?
Mindgard was founded in 2022.
Who owns Apiiro and Mindgard?
Mindgard is privately held.
Who are Apiiro and Mindgard sold to?
From its own pages, Apiiro presents Guardian Agent as delivering outcomes for CISOs and CTOs. Mindgard addresses organizations that secure the AI systems they build, buy and use.
What have Apiiro and Mindgard announced recently?
August 13, 2026: Mindgard announced a $30M Series A funding round.

About Apiiro

Apiiro offers Guardian Agent, which protects coding agents, prevents risk and AutoFixes backlogs, powered by the Apiiro Context Graph. Apiiro describes agentic development as a setting where code is written by agents, risk appears at machine speed, and offensive agents exploit vulnerabilities in seconds. Guardian Agent delivers three outcomes for CISOs and CTOs by executing actions and measuring success. On compliance, Apiiro provides automated evidence collection and policy enforcement for every feature and code change.[1][3][4][5]

Guardian Agent actions run on the AppSec Context Graph, made up of a Software Graph and a Risk Graph, which gives every action the context of policies and software architecture from prompt to code to runtime. Patented Deep Code Analysis (DCA) and code-to-runtime matching continuously map each customer's evolving software architecture, including APIs, AI assets, PII, OSS, internal packages and their material changes. Apiiro correlates code to runtime to trace exposure paths and reachability. Apiiro governs every tool and change, human or agent, with one policy and risk engine.[2][3][4]

Apiiro discovers, inventories and catalogs AI models, agents, MCP servers, AI datasets, 3rd-party services and everything inside codebases. Apiiro discovers and inventories the AI tools that developers and coding agents use, including IDEs, extensions, skills, plugins and MCP servers. Apiiro discovers, inventories and tracks open-source dependencies, licenses, end-of-life status, versions and vulnerabilities, and where they are used across the software architecture graph. Apiiro discovers, inventories and assesses cryptographic usage in code, including encryption, hashing, keys, secrets, certificates, algorithms and KMS implementation. Apiiro discovers, inventories and maps CI/CD pipelines, build systems, artifacts, registries, deployment flows and the software delivery paths from code to runtime. Apiiro's policy and risk engine is an open, graph-based risk engine that correlates findings from 1st/3rd-party tools, maps them to the software graph, detects toxic combinations and blast radius, and prioritizes business-specific risk. Apiiro assesses AI usage risks across code and the software supply chain, including dependencies, models, coding agents, MCP servers, skills and extensions. Apiiro continuously ingests, assesses, manages and tracks Software Bill of Materials (SBOMs) across codebases, the software supply chain (OSS) and 3rd-party applications.[1][7]

Autonomous monitoring detects new feature tickets in Jira, GitHub and Azure DevOps and triggers threat analysis with no human in the loop.[8]

AI-SAST shifts static analysis from a detection problem to a risk validation and fix problem. Deep Code Analysis (DCA) continuously builds a Software Graph of the software architecture across files, code modules, repositories and code owners, updated on every commit and material change. AI-SCA shifts open source security from CVE matching to risk validation and fix. Apiiro continuously detects vulnerable and malicious OSS components and risky licenses using AI-powered context from the customer's software graph and business risk. Dependency scanning runs to the leaf node, covering direct, transitive and custom-built internal dependencies. Open source coverage extends beyond CVEs to malicious packages, license conflicts and AI components.[5][6][7][9][10][12]

Apiiro detects secrets in code, history, documentation and pipelines. Apiiro surfaces secrets deleted from the codebase that remain in every branch and revision of Git history. Apiiro checks every detected secret against the issuing platform, marking it valid, invalid or revoked. Guardrails block valid secrets at the pull request, before deployment. Apiiro inventories AI agents, MCP servers, GenAI frameworks, models, datasets and AI-related secrets from code on every commit. Apiiro blocks unapproved frameworks and models at the pull request. Apiiro generates audit-ready evidence for the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF and ISO/IEC 42001 from code.[11][12]

Apiiro maps packages, skills and plugins to their repositories, coding agents, pipelines and running containers. Apiiro's Dependency Firewall scans open-source code using Deep Code Analysis to detect and block malicious packages before installation. Apiiro inspects packages downloaded by coding agents, locally and in the cloud, across operating systems. Package policies control installations based on malware, backdoors, vulnerabilities and application risk.[13]

AutoFix takes findings from Apiiro's own scanners, 3rd-party scanners and frontier model scans, and fixes them across the attack surface. Apiiro generates each fix in the context of the software architecture graph and organizational policies, and runs tests to prove nothing breaks. Apiiro reflects Chainguard's remediation state directly in Risk Graph, so findings Chainguard has already fixed stop showing as open. Apiiro AutoFixes OSS in first-party code based on risk and gives maintainers free AutoFix to accelerate community fixes.[1][2][3][5][6][7][8][9][10][14]

Apiiro on the record

Sources

Apiiro full record

  1. [1]apiiro.comApiiro · apiiro.com · undated page, accessed November 3, 2026 · Tier A
  2. [2]Apiiro named the most innovative aspm provider worldwide byfrostsullivansApiiro · apiiro.com · published December 9, 2025 · Tier A
  3. [3]Apiiro Context Graph: How it Works, Benefits, Use Cases | ApiiroApiiro · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  4. [4]Guardian Agent: Application Security Posture Management to action | ApiiroApiiro · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  5. [5]Guardian Agent: Secure agentic development | ApiiroApiiro · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  6. [6]Free AutoFix for open source maintainers | ApiiroApiiro · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  7. [7]Apiiro: Secure your agentic developmentApiiro · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  8. [8]Guardian Agent: AI Threat Modeling, Secure by Design | ApiiroApiiro · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  9. [9]AI-SAST: Static scanning reimagined | ApiiroApiiro · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  10. [10]AI-SCA: Open source security reimagined | ApiiroApiiro · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  11. [11]Secrets Security: Detect, validate, fix | ApiiroApiiro · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  12. [12]AI-SPM: Discover & govern every AI asset | ApiiroApiiro · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  13. [13]Guardian Agent: Protect from Software Supply Chain Attacks | ApiiroApiiro · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  14. [14]Guardian Agent: AutoFix SAST, SCA, Secrets, API, Containers | ApiiroApiiro · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  15. [15]Apiiro Reviews 2026: Details, Pricing, & FeaturesG2 · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier C

Mindgard full record

  1. [1]Mindgard - AI Red Teaming & AI Security SolutionsMindgard · undated page, accessed September 27, 2026 · Tier A
  2. [2]About Mindgard: Offensive AI Security CompanyMindgard · undated page, accessed September 27, 2026 · Tier A
  3. [3]Mindgard raises 30 million to protect ai systemsSecurityWeek · securityweek.com · published August 12, 2026 · Tier B
  4. [4]AI Security Software: Advanced AI Testing Tools - MindgardMindgard · undated page, accessed October 26, 2026 · Tier A
  5. [5]AI Security Services: Secure Agentic AI Systems - MindgardMindgard · undated page, accessed October 26, 2026 · Tier A
  6. [6]AI Red Teaming Services for LLMs and Agents - MindgardMindgard · undated page, accessed October 26, 2026 · Tier A
  7. [7]AI Penetration TestingMindgard · undated page, accessed October 26, 2026 · Tier A
  8. [8]AI Security Advisory Services for Enterprise AI - MindgardMindgard · undated page, accessed October 26, 2026 · Tier A
  9. [9]AI Security Consulting Services for Enterprise AI - MindgardMindgard · undated page, accessed October 26, 2026 · Tier A
  10. [10]AI Security TrainingMindgard · undated page, accessed October 26, 2026 · Tier A
  11. [11]Mindgard Raises $30M Series AMindgard · published August 13, 2026 · Tier A
  12. [12]Mindgard Unveils First Autonomous AI Security Platform To Identify And Fix Exploitable VulnerabilitiesBusiness Wire · published March 17, 2026 · Tier A
  13. [13]Offensive Security Tool for AI Systems - MindgardMindgard · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  14. [14]Mindgard vs Prompt SecurityMindgard · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  15. [15]AI Governance & ComplianceMindgard · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A

Spot a factual error? Request a correction.