CISO Tribune

Vendor comparison · 2 companies

AISLE vs Cycode

AISLE sells a platform that finds, fixes, and verifies vulnerabilities in source code. Cycode is the agentic development security platform that unifies visibility, prioritization, and remediation across the software development lifecycle. CISO Tribune files both under Static application security testing. This page sets the two records side by side: what each sells, where it is based, who owns and funds it, the customers it names and its recent news, each fact numbered to its source.

Change the companies

Up to four companies side by side.

  • AISLE
  • Cycode
AISLE vs Cycode: Products, Customers and Funding Compared
AISLEAISLE sells a platform that finds, fixes, and verifies vulnerabilities in source code.aisle.comCycodeCycode is the agentic development security platform that unifies visibility, prioritization, and remediation across the software development lifecycle.cycode.com
What it sells
  • AISLE Snapshot[2][10]AISLE Snapshot is a one-time AI-native security audit.
  • Agentic Development Security Platform[3][5]Cycode's platform for finding and fixing risk before it reaches production.
  • Maestro[1][3][6]Cycode Maestro orchestrates AI Teammates that assess exposure, analyze exploitability, and generate fixes.
  • Context Intelligence Graph[6]A single shared graph that distills noisy alerts into risks that matter.
  • Cycode SAST[7]Static application security testing (SAST) for code, designed by developers, for developers.
  • ConnectorX[8]Cycode's click and connect ASPM integration platform.
Categories
Headquarters
Not stated on its pagesNot stated on its pages
Founded
Not stated on its pages2019[2]
Ownership and funding
Not stated on its pagesNot stated on its pages
Named customers
Not stated on its pagesNot stated on its pages
Recent news
  • November 10, 2026AISLE announced it has been formally acquired by Cohere and will serve customers as Cohere Cyber from that day.[11]
Not stated on its pages
G2 and Gartner Peer Insights
  • G2: listed, seen November 10, 2026[12]
  • Gartner Peer Insights: Not stated on its pages
  • G2: listed, seen November 3, 2026[4]
  • Gartner Peer Insights: Not stated on its pages
Who it fits
AISLE describes a managed option for teams whose code classification allows external processing by frontier LLMs. AISLE describes a cloud-account option for organizations that want full control without the infrastructure overhead. AISLE describes an option on the customer's own GPUs for teams that need full authority over compute, storage, and access.From its own pages, Cycode sells to large enterprises, with gaming platforms and financial institutions described among them. Cycode also addresses automotive software development. Its pages speak to security and development teams that want to align on application security posture. Cycode offers deployment on public cloud, private cloud, and on-premises environments.
Last verified
October 16, 2026September 27, 2026

Where they overlap

  • AISLE and Cycode are both filed under Static application security testing.

Where they differ, field by field

  • AISLE's primary category is Static application security testing; Cycode's is Application security posture management.
  • Cycode is also filed under Software supply chain security.
  • AISLE lists AISLE Snapshot. Cycode lists Agentic Development Security Platform, Maestro, Context Intelligence Graph, Cycode SAST and ConnectorX.
  • Cycode was founded in 2019.

What it sells: AISLE

What AISLE Snapshot does[2][10]
An enterprise ran a one-time AI-native security audit, AISLE Snapshot. A global network infra enterprise could not send its source code to an AI security vendor.

What it sells: Cycode

What Agentic Development Security Platform does[3][5]
Cycode says it unifies control, context, and autonomy on a single platform. Cycode provides end-to-end controls for the AI layer of the software factory. Customers can deploy on public cloud, or on private cloud and on-premises environments through the Cycode Enterprise Server offering.
What Maestro does[1][3][6]
Cycode says its specialized agents find and fix exploitable risks 17x faster. Cycode says teams can extend agent skills and implement controls with full audit trails.
What Cycode SAST does[7]
Cycode SAST supports a wide range of programming languages and SCMs. Language support covers Java, C#, JavaScript, PHP, Python, Ruby, and Go. SCM support covers GitHub, GitLab, BitBucket, Azure DevOps, and Gerrit.

Questions about AISLE and Cycode

What do AISLE and Cycode sell?
AISLE sells AISLE Snapshot. Cycode sells Agentic Development Security Platform, Maestro, Context Intelligence Graph, Cycode SAST and ConnectorX.
Are AISLE and Cycode in the same category?
They share Static application security testing. AISLE's primary category is Static application security testing and Cycode's is Application security posture management.
When were AISLE and Cycode founded?
Cycode was founded in 2019.
Who are AISLE and Cycode sold to?
AISLE describes a managed option for teams whose code classification allows external processing by frontier LLMs. From its own pages, Cycode sells to large enterprises, with gaming platforms and financial institutions described among them.
What have AISLE and Cycode announced recently?
November 10, 2026: AISLE announced it has been formally acquired by Cohere and will serve customers as Cohere Cyber from that day.

About AISLE

AISLE sells a platform that finds, fixes, and verifies vulnerabilities in source code. AISLE continuously finds, verifies, and fixes vulnerabilities in code, and it can run in any deployment environment with the AI of the customer's choice. Cohere has formally acquired AISLE, and customers are served as Cohere Cyber.[5]

AISLE uses thousands of agents that reason in parallel across a codebase, its dependencies, and its architecture. AISLE connects to GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, and Azure DevOps, then reads the branch the customer nominates, maps the stack and the build system, and identifies the dependencies. AISLE analyzes source code, dependencies and licenses, secrets, and IaC configs. AISLE reasons through code, looking at how data moves through it, what is reachable, and what an attacker could exploit. AISLE combines static reasoning with dynamic analysis via AI-guided fuzzing. AI-native analysis in AISLE covers Python, JavaScript, TypeScript, Java, C#, C, C++, Rust, Go, PHP, Kotlin, Swift, Ruby, and more.[5][6]

For dependencies, AISLE finds vulnerabilities, assesses whether the dependencies actually get used and exposed, and flags dependencies that violate license policies. AISLE analyzes credentials, keys, and tokens in repositories. AISLE reviews Terraform, CloudFormation, Kubernetes, and Dockerfile configs to find misconfigurations and propose fixes before deployment. Customers describe their trust boundaries, intent, and policies in plain English.[6]

AISLE ranks every issue by exploitability, reachability, and impact, not just CVSS. AISLE checks every finding with multiple, independent agents to verify exploitability. AISLE assesses findings based on a customer's threat model and the feedback the customer gives it. Customers can chat with the platform to inspect the evidence for each prioritization decision. A customer who disagrees with a triage decision can explain why and send the issue back through triage, and AISLE re-assesses it and applies that reasoning to future prioritization across the repository. AISLE ingests and prioritizes issues from third-party scanners in the same workflow as AISLE findings. Customers tell the platform what to do with low, medium, high, and critical severity findings.[7]

AISLE builds the repository in an isolated container, applies the patch, and runs the tests against it. AISLE uses both CI and agent-generated sandboxed tests to verify each fix it generates. AISLE does not merge fixes on its own, and it opens the pull request and waits for human approval. AISLE fixes code and dependency findings, and it provides remediation guidance for secrets, license policy, and infrastructure-as-code findings. AISLE bumps a dependency to the fixed version and edits code to adapt to any API changes. AISLE explains each change in natural language and delivers its fixes as pull requests. AISLE resolves findings with a round of confirmation analysis that runs automatically after a fix is merged. Customers decide how far AISLE goes on its own, per severity and per repository.[8]

AISLE does not train on customer code. AISLE builds context at the repository, product, or codebase level, updates it with every run, and reads it before analyzing new findings. Customers can dismiss a finding and explain why in natural language, and AISLE turns the reasons into guidance. Everything AISLE learns about a repository is visible, editable, and dated. Customers can accept a risk for a given amount of time, and AISLE resurfaces it when the time is up.[9]

AISLE can run the infrastructure while the customer connects its repositories, for teams whose code classification allows external processing by frontier LLMs. AISLE can run inside a customer's cloud account using the customer's choice of frontier and custom LLMs, with deployment artifacts delivered in push or pull mode into a local registry. AISLE can run on the customer's GPUs, using custom models recommended by AISLE, plus optional threat and dependency intel pulled from AISLE servers. AISLE can run disconnected using fine-tuned security models, with no network path in or out. AISLE provides single-tenant cloud deployments in the region of the customer's choice. AISLE maintains a zero data-retention policy with every model provider, and none of a customer's data is used for training. AISLE is not bound to a single model vendor or a fixed list of languages.[5][6]

The OpenSSL Foundation has AISLE analyze every pull request. The curl project, maintained by a full-time team of one, has found and fixed 35 CVEs and 160 bugs with AISLE. An enterprise ran a one-time AI-native security audit, AISLE Snapshot. A global network infra enterprise could not send its source code to an AI security vendor.[1][3][5][9][10]

AISLE on the record

Sources

AISLE full record

  1. [1]Aisle named cve numbering authority formalizing commitment to transparent vulnerability disclosureAISLE · aisle.com · published July 22, 2026 · Tier A
  2. [2]aisle.comAISLE · aisle.com · undated page, accessed October 16, 2026 · Tier A
  3. [3]Limited use termsAISLE · aisle.com · published January 29, 2026 · Tier A
  4. [4]AISLE | AI-Native Vulnerability ManagementAISLE · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  5. [5]AISLE Platform | Autonomous AI to Find & Fix VulnerabilitiesAISLE · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  6. [6]Vulnerability Discovery with AI-Native Code Analysis | AISLEAISLE · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  7. [7]Vulnerability Triage Prioritized by Real-World Risk | AISLEAISLE · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  8. [8]Autonomous Vulnerability Remediation, Verified | AISLEAISLE · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  9. [9]Vulnerability Management That Learns From You | AISLEAISLE · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  10. [10]AISLE Customers | Case Studies & ResultsAISLE · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  11. [11]AISLE Press ReleasesAISLE · published November 10, 2026 · Tier A
  12. [12]Aisle Planner Reviews 2026: Details, Pricing, & FeaturesG2 · undated page, accessed November 10, 2026 · Tier C

Cycode full record

  1. [1]cycode.comCycode · cycode.com · undated page, accessed September 27, 2026 · Tier A
  2. [2]About usCycode · cycode.com · undated page, accessed September 27, 2026 · Tier A
  3. [3]Cycode | Agentic Development Security PlatformCycode · undated page, accessed October 24, 2026 · Tier A
  4. [4]Cycode Reviews 2026: Details, Pricing, & Features - G2G2 · undated page, accessed October 24, 2026 · Tier C
  5. [5]Cycode ReviewsCycode · undated page, accessed November 3, 2026 · Tier A
  6. [6]Agentic Development Security Platform (ADSP) | CycodeCycode · undated page, accessed November 3, 2026 · Tier A
  7. [7]SAST Tool - Static Application Security TestingCycode · undated page, accessed November 3, 2026 · Tier A
  8. [8]Cycode Introduces a Complete Approach to ASPMCycode · published November 14, 2023 · Tier A
  9. [9]Cycode Security & TrustCycode · undated page, accessed November 3, 2026 · Tier A
  10. [10]Automotive Software Security | CycodeCycode · undated page, accessed November 3, 2026 · Tier A
  11. [11]Cycode | About UsCycode · undated page, accessed November 3, 2026 · Tier A

Spot a factual error? Request a correction.